Christopher Eubanks vs Marc Polmans — Busan CH Round of 32

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA2
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 May 2023
hard
Marc Polmans
AUS
Marc Polmans
#344ATP
1449ELO
1414Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWWL
Eubanks C.
4-6 6-3 7-6
Polmans M.
Eubanks C.
46782
Polmans M.
63661

Christopher Eubanks defeated Marc Polmans 4-6 6-3 7-6 in the Busan CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Marc Polmans came in ranked #344, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Eubanks C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Polmans M.

Polmans M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Eubanks C.Polmans M.
1st serve in·Even
68%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
32%
38%
Break points saved·Even
64%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.6
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Eubanks C.Polmans M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
79
Break points won·Slight edge
3
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
67
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Eubanks C.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Polmans M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.0+79 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.0Hard Elo 1414
5.9Overall Elo 1523
ELO gap
4.1Overall Elo 1449
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.9
Surface form
5.7
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
3.6
Minutes 14d
3.5
0.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Eubanks C.Polmans M.
Freshness·
—
100

Polmans M.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Vukic A.[6]
Purcell M.[1]
6-41-0
Semi-finals
Purcell M.[1]
Diallo G.
6-47-5
Vukic A.[6]
Holt B.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Holt B.
Tu L.
6-46-4
Purcell M.[1]
Uchiyama Y.
6-47-5
Diallo G.
Thompson J.[3]
6-37-5
Vukic A.[6]
Eubanks C.[2]
6-747-636-4
R16
Purcell M.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-26-4
Diallo G.
Chung Y.
7-657-64
Thompson J.[3]
Donskoy E.
7-56-3
Eubanks C.[2]
Jung J.
6-46-3
Holt B.
Saville L.
6-36-3
Vukic A.[6]
Shimabukuro S.
7-616-4
Uchiyama Y.
Hijikata R.[5]
6-43-66-4
Tu L.
Celikbilek A.
6-47-65
R32
Jung J.
Hong S.
6-23-0
Purcell M.[1]
Mochizuki Y.
6-36-3
Hsu Y.
Tokuda R.
7-646-3
Tu L.
Yunchaokete B.
6-46-4
Shimabukuro S.
Moriya H.
6-726-27-5
Vukic A.[6]
Harris L.
7-656-3
Holt B.
Gomez E.[4]
6-26-2
Celikbilek A.
Uchida K.[7]
6-26-4
Thompson J.[3]
Masur D.
6-16-1
Hijikata R.[5]
Jasika O.
6-766-36-2
Uchiyama Y.
Chung H.
6-36-736-2
Eubanks C.[2]
Polmans M.
4-66-37-66
Saville L.
Berankis R.
7-636-3
Chung Y.
Wu T.
7-56-2
Donskoy E.
Shimizu Y.
7-53-66-0
Diallo G.
Nam J.
6-36-3