Jordan Thompson vs Evgeny Donskoy — Busan CH Round of 16

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jordan Thompson
AUS3
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1733Hard ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 May 2023
hard
RUS
Evgeny Donskoy
36 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLL
Thompson J.
7-5 6-3
Donskoy E.
Thompson J.
762
Donskoy E.
530

Jordan Thompson defeated Evgeny Donskoy 7-5 6-3 in the Busan CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Thompson J.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Donskoy E.

Donskoy E.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thompson J.Donskoy E.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
55%
53%
Service points won·Even
66%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.3
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.2
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (164 vs 80). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thompson J.Donskoy E.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
25
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
89
Break points won·Clear edge
24
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
65

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Thompson J.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Donskoy E.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
8.5
Surface form
5.2
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
2.9
Minutes 14d
6.8
7.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Vukic A.[6]
Purcell M.[1]
6-41-0
Semi-finals
Purcell M.[1]
Diallo G.
6-47-5
Vukic A.[6]
Holt B.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Holt B.
Tu L.
6-46-4
Purcell M.[1]
Uchiyama Y.
6-47-5
Diallo G.
Thompson J.[3]
6-37-5
Vukic A.[6]
Eubanks C.[2]
6-747-636-4
R16
Purcell M.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-26-4
Diallo G.
Chung Y.
7-657-64
Thompson J.[3]
Donskoy E.
7-56-3
Eubanks C.[2]
Jung J.
6-46-3
Holt B.
Saville L.
6-36-3
Vukic A.[6]
Shimabukuro S.
7-616-4
Uchiyama Y.
Hijikata R.[5]
6-43-66-4
Tu L.
Celikbilek A.
6-47-65
R32
Jung J.
Hong S.
6-23-0
Purcell M.[1]
Mochizuki Y.
6-36-3
Hsu Y.
Tokuda R.
7-646-3
Tu L.
Yunchaokete B.
6-46-4
Shimabukuro S.
Moriya H.
6-726-27-5
Vukic A.[6]
Harris L.
7-656-3
Holt B.
Gomez E.[4]
6-26-2
Celikbilek A.
Uchida K.[7]
6-26-4
Thompson J.[3]
Masur D.
6-16-1
Hijikata R.[5]
Jasika O.
6-766-36-2
Uchiyama Y.
Chung H.
6-36-736-2
Eubanks C.[2]
Polmans M.
4-66-37-66
Saville L.
Berankis R.
7-636-3
Chung Y.
Wu T.
7-56-2
Donskoy E.
Shimizu Y.
7-53-66-0
Diallo G.
Nam J.
6-36-3