Gabriel Diallo vs Ji Sung Nam — Busan CH Round of 32

Busan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Gabriel Diallo
CAN
Gabriel Diallo
#93ATP
1716ELO
1678Hard ELO
$480kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
24 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 May 2023
hard
KOR
Ji Sung Nam
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
Diallo G.
6-3 6-3
Nam J.
Diallo G.
662
Nam J.
330

Gabriel Diallo defeated Ji Sung Nam 6-3 6-3 in the Busan CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Ji Sung Nam came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Diallo G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Nam J.

Nam J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Diallo G.

Serve advantage — Diallo G.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Diallo G.Nam J.
38
Serve
—
14
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Diallo G.Nam J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
60%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.4
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 81). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Diallo G.Nam J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
64
0
Break points saved·Dominant
96
26
Break points won·Even
24
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
68
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Diallo G.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Nam J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
4.6
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
5.3
7.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Diallo G.Nam J.
Freshness·
89
—

Diallo G.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Vukic A.[6]
Purcell M.[1]
6-41-0
Semi-finals
Purcell M.[1]
Diallo G.
6-47-5
Vukic A.[6]
Holt B.
7-646-1
Quarter-finals
Holt B.
Tu L.
6-46-4
Purcell M.[1]
Uchiyama Y.
6-47-5
Diallo G.
Thompson J.[3]
6-37-5
Vukic A.[6]
Eubanks C.[2]
6-747-636-4
R16
Purcell M.[1]
Hsu Y.
6-26-4
Diallo G.
Chung Y.
7-657-64
Thompson J.[3]
Donskoy E.
7-56-3
Eubanks C.[2]
Jung J.
6-46-3
Holt B.
Saville L.
6-36-3
Vukic A.[6]
Shimabukuro S.
7-616-4
Uchiyama Y.
Hijikata R.[5]
6-43-66-4
Tu L.
Celikbilek A.
6-47-65
R32
Jung J.
Hong S.
6-23-0
Purcell M.[1]
Mochizuki Y.
6-36-3
Hsu Y.
Tokuda R.
7-646-3
Tu L.
Yunchaokete B.
6-46-4
Shimabukuro S.
Moriya H.
6-726-27-5
Vukic A.[6]
Harris L.
7-656-3
Holt B.
Gomez E.[4]
6-26-2
Celikbilek A.
Uchida K.[7]
6-26-4
Thompson J.[3]
Masur D.
6-16-1
Hijikata R.[5]
Jasika O.
6-766-36-2
Uchiyama Y.
Chung H.
6-36-736-2
Eubanks C.[2]
Polmans M.
4-66-37-66
Saville L.
Berankis R.
7-636-3
Chung Y.
Wu T.
7-56-2
Donskoy E.
Shimizu Y.
7-53-66-0
Diallo G.
Nam J.
6-36-3