Billy Harris vs Martin Damm — Prague CH Qualifying Round 2

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
Billy Harris
GBR8
Billy Harris
#154ATP
1508ELO
1363Clay ELO
$236kYTD
$1.5MCAREER
31 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 8 May 2023
clay
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1535Clay ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
Harris B.
6-4 6-3
Damm M.
Harris B.
662
Damm M.
430

Billy Harris defeated Martin Damm 6-4 6-3 in the Prague CH qualifying round 2 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

  • Match story: Billy Harris closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Harris B.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Damm M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Harris B.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Harris B.Damm M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
68%
Return points won·Even
36%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.8
12.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.4
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 147). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Harris B.Damm M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
47
26
Break points saved·Even
91
93
Break points won·Slight edge
10
1
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
5
Tiebreaks·Dominant
23
84

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Harris B.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Damm M.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
3.6Clay Elo 1363
Surface ELO
6.4+172 Clay Elo edge
2.6Overall Elo 1508
ELO gap
7.4Overall Elo 1706
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.7
Surface form
5.5
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Harris B.Damm M.
Freshness·Even
96
92

Harris B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Damm M.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Sachko V.[8]
Houkes M.
4-66-47-5
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Moro Canas A.[12]
6-26-4
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
Hrazdil J.
7-626-1
Delbonis F.[3]
Domingues J.
6-33-66-3
Gaio F.
Laaksonen H.[4]
6-45-76-3
Choinski J.[1]
Molleker R.
6-06-3
Andreozzi G.[6]
Rybakov A.[11]
6-36-3
Harris B.[8]
Damm M.
6-46-3
Santillan A.
Stodder T.[9]
7-666-2
Rincon D.[5]
Artnak B.
6-26-2
Elias G.[10]
Prihodko O.
7-646-3
Molleker R.[7]
Sachko V.[1]
6-46-2
Kivattsev K.[8]
Filip J.
6-16-4
Nicod J.
Soriano Barrera A.[5]
6-26-3
Gomez F.[4]
Damas M.
6-26-2
Debru G.[3]
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
6-16-0
Cias P.
Donski A.
7-617-67
Nicod J.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-26-3
Vrbensky M.[1]
Faria J.[9]
6-36-4
Q1
Laaksonen H.[4]
Mensik J.
2-66-26-4
Delbonis F.[3]
Squire H.
6-26-3
Domingues J.
Gengel M.[10]
4-66-16-2
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-3
Molleker R.
Lazarov A.[11]
7-54-67-65
Houkes M.
Mochizuki S.[5]
7-636-3
Moro Canas A.[12]
Barnat J.
7-57-5
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
Rosol L.
2-66-36-4
Hrazdil J.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-26-4
Gaio F.
Yevseyev D.[9]
6-06-756-3
Choinski J.[1]
Harris B.
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.
Mensik J.
2-66-26-4
Andreozzi G.[6]
Manafov V.
6-26-4
Rybakov A.[11]
Rikl P.
7-657-5
Damm M.
Yevseyev D.[2]
6-36-2
Stodder T.[9]
Filip J.
3-66-46-4
Harris B.[8]
Barton H.
6-46-3
Santillan A.
Gengel M.[3]
6-26-0
Artnak B.
Paulson A.[12]
4-66-36-4
Rincon D.[5]
Brunclik P.
6-16-767-63
Elias G.[10]
Bolardt A.
6-27-5
Molleker R.[7]
Lomakin G.
6-36-3
Sachko V.[1]
Haerteis J.
5-76-26-1
Prihodko O.
Domingues J.[4]
6-45-76-3
Nicod J.
Milev Y.[12]
4-66-16-2
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Piraino G.[7]
7-56-3
Damas M.
Butvilas E.[11]
6-46-4
Filip J.
Cukierman D.[2]
6-36-3
Kivattsev K.[8]
Barnat J.
6-46-1
Donski A.
Potenza L.[10]
6-26-3
Cias P.
Merida Aguilar D.[6]
6-46-2
Gomez F.[4]
Prihodko O.
6-44-66-4
Faria J.[9]
Siniakov D.
6-16-4
Nicod J.
Milev Y.
4-66-16-2
Debru G.[3]
Metreveli A.
6-27-5
Vrbensky M.[1]
Kielan S.
6-26-4