Bor Artnak vs Andrew Paulson — Prague CH Qualifying Round 1

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
SLO
Bor Artnak
#435ATP
1253ELO
1290Clay ELO
22 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 8 May 2023
clay
Andrew Paulson
CZE12
Andrew Paulson
#602ATP
1452ELO
1427Clay ELO
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Artnak B.
4-6 6-3 6-4
Paulson A.
Artnak B.
4662
Paulson A.
6341

Bor Artnak defeated Andrew Paulson 4-6 6-3 6-4 in the Prague CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Artnak B.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Paulson A.

Paulson A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Artnak B.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Artnak B.Paulson A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
53%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.5
4.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.2
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 73). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Artnak B.
4.6
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 57 days (−0.7)
Paulson A.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.6
Surface form
3.9
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
4.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Sachko V.[8]
Houkes M.
4-66-47-5
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Moro Canas A.[12]
6-26-4
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
Hrazdil J.
7-626-1
Delbonis F.[3]
Domingues J.
6-33-66-3
Gaio F.
Laaksonen H.[4]
6-45-76-3
Choinski J.[1]
Molleker R.
6-06-3
Andreozzi G.[6]
Rybakov A.[11]
6-36-3
Harris B.[8]
Damm M.
6-46-3
Santillan A.
Stodder T.[9]
7-666-2
Rincon D.[5]
Artnak B.
6-26-2
Elias G.[10]
Prihodko O.
7-646-3
Molleker R.[7]
Sachko V.[1]
6-46-2
Kivattsev K.[8]
Filip J.
6-16-4
Nicod J.
Soriano Barrera A.[5]
6-26-3
Gomez F.[4]
Damas M.
6-26-2
Debru G.[3]
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
6-16-0
Cias P.
Donski A.
7-617-67
Nicod J.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-26-3
Vrbensky M.[1]
Faria J.[9]
6-36-4
Q1
Laaksonen H.[4]
Mensik J.
2-66-26-4
Delbonis F.[3]
Squire H.
6-26-3
Domingues J.
Gengel M.[10]
4-66-16-2
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-3
Molleker R.
Lazarov A.[11]
7-54-67-65
Houkes M.
Mochizuki S.[5]
7-636-3
Moro Canas A.[12]
Barnat J.
7-57-5
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
Rosol L.
2-66-36-4
Hrazdil J.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-26-4
Gaio F.
Yevseyev D.[9]
6-06-756-3
Choinski J.[1]
Harris B.
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.
Mensik J.
2-66-26-4
Andreozzi G.[6]
Manafov V.
6-26-4
Rybakov A.[11]
Rikl P.
7-657-5
Damm M.
Yevseyev D.[2]
6-36-2
Stodder T.[9]
Filip J.
3-66-46-4
Harris B.[8]
Barton H.
6-46-3
Santillan A.
Gengel M.[3]
6-26-0
Artnak B.
Paulson A.[12]
4-66-36-4
Rincon D.[5]
Brunclik P.
6-16-767-63
Elias G.[10]
Bolardt A.
6-27-5
Molleker R.[7]
Lomakin G.
6-36-3
Sachko V.[1]
Haerteis J.
5-76-26-1
Prihodko O.
Domingues J.[4]
6-45-76-3
Nicod J.
Milev Y.[12]
4-66-16-2
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Piraino G.[7]
7-56-3
Damas M.
Butvilas E.[11]
6-46-4
Filip J.
Cukierman D.[2]
6-36-3
Kivattsev K.[8]
Barnat J.
6-46-1
Donski A.
Potenza L.[10]
6-26-3
Cias P.
Merida Aguilar D.[6]
6-46-2
Gomez F.[4]
Prihodko O.
6-44-66-4
Faria J.[9]
Siniakov D.
6-16-4
Nicod J.
Milev Y.
4-66-16-2
Debru G.[3]
Metreveli A.
6-27-5
Vrbensky M.[1]
Kielan S.
6-26-4