Li Tu vs Tung Lin Wu — Gwangju CH Round of 32

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 May 2023
hard
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Tu L.
6-3 6-2
Wu T.
Tu L.
662
Wu T.
320

Li Tu defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-3 6-2 in the Gwangju CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tung Lin Wu came in ranked #329, defending last year's round of 32, but Li Tu had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 4 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Tu L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Tu L.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.2
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (184 vs 187). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Tu L.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
27
10
Break points saved·Even
82
84
Break points won·Even
8
6
Deciding sets·Clear edge
20
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
64
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Tu L.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Wu T.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.1+95 Hard Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.9Hard Elo 1376
6.2Overall Elo 1488
ELO gap
3.8Overall Elo 1406
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
1.7
Surface form
5.0
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
9.1
Minutes 14d
4.2
3-set count
0.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Tu L.Wu T.
Freshness·
—
80

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[3]
Purcell M.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Purcell M.[1]
Polmans M.
6-06-2
Thompson J.[3]
Eubanks C.[2]
7-636-3
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[2]
Yunchaokete B.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Jung J.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Hijikata R.[6]
6-46-4
Purcell M.[1]
Gomez E.[5]
6-27-63
R16
Eubanks C.[2]
Holt B.
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.
Vukic A.[7]
6-47-64
Hijikata R.[6]
Tu L.
6-47-63
Jung J.
Chung Y.
3-66-36-4
Polmans M.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-37-65
Purcell M.[1]
Saville L.
6-26-2
Gomez E.[5]
Palan D.
6-36-2
Thompson J.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-26-4
R32
Chung Y.
Uchida K.
7-646-3
Duckworth J.[4]
Jasika O.
6-36-1
Yunchaokete B.
Sin S.
6-46-1
Gomez E.[5]
Celikbilek A.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.[6]
Diallo G.
6-26-4
Donskoy E.
Masur D.
6-36-1
Eubanks C.[2]
Harris L.
7-634-66-4
Holt B.
Ilkel C.
3-66-06-1
Vukic A.[7]
Shimabukuro S.
7-57-62
Thompson J.[3]
Park U.
6-16-736-0
Tu L.
Wu T.
6-36-2
Jung J.
Kudla D.[8]
6-36-716-3
Palan D.
Hsu Y.
6-26-3
Saville L.
Gojowczyk P.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[1]
Berankis R.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Shimizu Y.
2-67-56-4