Max Purcell vs Luke Saville — Gwangju CH Round of 16

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS1
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 May 2023
hard
AUS
Luke Saville
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLW
Purcell M.
6-2 6-2
Saville L.
Purcell M.
662
Saville L.
220

Max Purcell defeated Luke Saville 6-2 6-2 in the Gwangju CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Saville L.

Saville L.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Serve advantage — Purcell M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Saville L.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.5
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (124 vs 61). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Saville L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
19
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
69
Break points won·Even
10
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
84
29
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Purcell M.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Saville L.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
4.9
0.0
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
5.7
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[3]
Purcell M.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Purcell M.[1]
Polmans M.
6-06-2
Thompson J.[3]
Eubanks C.[2]
7-636-3
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[2]
Yunchaokete B.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Jung J.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Hijikata R.[6]
6-46-4
Purcell M.[1]
Gomez E.[5]
6-27-63
R16
Eubanks C.[2]
Holt B.
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.
Vukic A.[7]
6-47-64
Hijikata R.[6]
Tu L.
6-47-63
Jung J.
Chung Y.
3-66-36-4
Polmans M.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-37-65
Purcell M.[1]
Saville L.
6-26-2
Gomez E.[5]
Palan D.
6-36-2
Thompson J.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-26-4
R32
Chung Y.
Uchida K.
7-646-3
Duckworth J.[4]
Jasika O.
6-36-1
Yunchaokete B.
Sin S.
6-46-1
Gomez E.[5]
Celikbilek A.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.[6]
Diallo G.
6-26-4
Donskoy E.
Masur D.
6-36-1
Eubanks C.[2]
Harris L.
7-634-66-4
Holt B.
Ilkel C.
3-66-06-1
Vukic A.[7]
Shimabukuro S.
7-57-62
Thompson J.[3]
Park U.
6-16-736-0
Tu L.
Wu T.
6-36-2
Jung J.
Kudla D.[8]
6-36-716-3
Palan D.
Hsu Y.
6-26-3
Saville L.
Gojowczyk P.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[1]
Berankis R.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Shimizu Y.
2-67-56-4