Marc Polmans vs Jason Jung — Gwangju CH Quarter-final

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Marc Polmans
AUS
Marc Polmans
#344ATP
1449ELO
1414Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 May 2023
hard
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
Polmans M.
6-4 6-3
Jung J.
Polmans M.
662
Jung J.
430

Marc Polmans defeated Jason Jung 6-4 6-3 in the Gwangju CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Marc Polmans came in ranked #344, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Marc Polmans closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Polmans M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Jung J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Polmans M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Polmans M.Jung J.
1st serve in·Even
66%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.4
2.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 74). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Polmans M.Jung J.
Clutch Rating·Even
23
21
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
64
Break points won·Even
10
8
Deciding sets·Slight edge
31
21
Tiebreaks·Dominant
24
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Polmans M.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Jung J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.9
Surface form
4.6
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.8
Minutes 14d
8.8
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Polmans M.Jung J.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
78

Polmans M.: 21 days rest · Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[3]
Purcell M.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Purcell M.[1]
Polmans M.
6-06-2
Thompson J.[3]
Eubanks C.[2]
7-636-3
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[2]
Yunchaokete B.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Jung J.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Hijikata R.[6]
6-46-4
Purcell M.[1]
Gomez E.[5]
6-27-63
R16
Eubanks C.[2]
Holt B.
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.
Vukic A.[7]
6-47-64
Hijikata R.[6]
Tu L.
6-47-63
Jung J.
Chung Y.
3-66-36-4
Polmans M.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-37-65
Purcell M.[1]
Saville L.
6-26-2
Gomez E.[5]
Palan D.
6-36-2
Thompson J.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-26-4
R32
Chung Y.
Uchida K.
7-646-3
Duckworth J.[4]
Jasika O.
6-36-1
Yunchaokete B.
Sin S.
6-46-1
Gomez E.[5]
Celikbilek A.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.[6]
Diallo G.
6-26-4
Donskoy E.
Masur D.
6-36-1
Eubanks C.[2]
Harris L.
7-634-66-4
Holt B.
Ilkel C.
3-66-06-1
Vukic A.[7]
Shimabukuro S.
7-57-62
Thompson J.[3]
Park U.
6-16-736-0
Tu L.
Wu T.
6-36-2
Jung J.
Kudla D.[8]
6-36-716-3
Palan D.
Hsu Y.
6-26-3
Saville L.
Gojowczyk P.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[1]
Berankis R.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Shimizu Y.
2-67-56-4