Jason Jung vs Denis Kudla — Gwangju CH Round of 32

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jason Jung
TPE
Jason Jung
#896ATP
1420ELO
1389Hard ELO
37 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 May 2023
hard
USA8
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
Jung J.
6-3 6-7 6-3
Kudla D.
Jung J.
66162
Kudla D.
37731

Jason Jung defeated Denis Kudla 6-3 6-7 6-3 in the Gwangju CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Denis Kudla came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jason Jung claimed a first win over Denis Kudla in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Jung closed it out in three sets, 6–3 6–7 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-02-10MemphisQ2hardDenis Kudla6-2 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Jung J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Kudla D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Jung J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Jung J.Kudla D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.6
5.8
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (74 vs 101). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Jung J.Kudla D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
21
50
Break points saved·Dominant
64
90
Break points won·Slight edge
8
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
21
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
69
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Jung J.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kudla D.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.6
Surface form
4.0
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
6.7
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Jung J.Kudla D.
Freshness·
78
—

Jung J.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[3]
Purcell M.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Purcell M.[1]
Polmans M.
6-06-2
Thompson J.[3]
Eubanks C.[2]
7-636-3
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[2]
Yunchaokete B.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Jung J.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Hijikata R.[6]
6-46-4
Purcell M.[1]
Gomez E.[5]
6-27-63
R16
Eubanks C.[2]
Holt B.
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.
Vukic A.[7]
6-47-64
Hijikata R.[6]
Tu L.
6-47-63
Jung J.
Chung Y.
3-66-36-4
Polmans M.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-37-65
Purcell M.[1]
Saville L.
6-26-2
Gomez E.[5]
Palan D.
6-36-2
Thompson J.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-26-4
R32
Chung Y.
Uchida K.
7-646-3
Duckworth J.[4]
Jasika O.
6-36-1
Yunchaokete B.
Sin S.
6-46-1
Gomez E.[5]
Celikbilek A.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.[6]
Diallo G.
6-26-4
Donskoy E.
Masur D.
6-36-1
Eubanks C.[2]
Harris L.
7-634-66-4
Holt B.
Ilkel C.
3-66-06-1
Vukic A.[7]
Shimabukuro S.
7-57-62
Thompson J.[3]
Park U.
6-16-736-0
Tu L.
Wu T.
6-36-2
Jung J.
Kudla D.[8]
6-36-716-3
Palan D.
Hsu Y.
6-26-3
Saville L.
Gojowczyk P.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[1]
Berankis R.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Shimizu Y.
2-67-56-4