Max Houkes vs Shintaro Mochizuki — Prague CH Qualifying Round 1

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
NED
Max Houkes
#239ATP
1460ELO
1444Clay ELO
26 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 May 2023
clay
Shintaro Mochizuki
JPN5
Shintaro Mochizuki
#151ATP
1475ELO
1433Clay ELO
$243kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
23 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWLWW
Houkes M.
7-6 6-3
Mochizuki S.
Houkes M.
7762
Mochizuki S.
6330

Max Houkes defeated Shintaro Mochizuki 7-6 6-3 in the Prague CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Max Houkes closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Houkes M.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Mochizuki S.

Mochizuki S.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Houkes M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Houkes M.Mochizuki S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
57%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (115 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Houkes M.Mochizuki S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
23
52
Break points saved·Slight edge
66
74
Break points won·Dominant
29
55
Deciding sets·Clear edge
34
46
Tiebreaks·Dominant
16
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Houkes M.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry Score
Mochizuki S.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
5.2+11 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
4.8Clay Elo 1433
5.0Overall Elo 1460
ELO gap
5.0Overall Elo 1475
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.7
Surface form
7.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
4.9
7.0
3-set count
0.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Houkes M.Mochizuki S.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
77

Houkes M.: 19 days rest · Mochizuki S.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Sachko V.[8]
Houkes M.
4-66-47-5
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Moro Canas A.[12]
6-26-4
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
Hrazdil J.
7-626-1
Delbonis F.[3]
Domingues J.
6-33-66-3
Gaio F.
Laaksonen H.[4]
6-45-76-3
Choinski J.[1]
Molleker R.
6-06-3
Andreozzi G.[6]
Rybakov A.[11]
6-36-3
Harris B.[8]
Damm M.
6-46-3
Santillan A.
Stodder T.[9]
7-666-2
Rincon D.[5]
Artnak B.
6-26-2
Elias G.[10]
Prihodko O.
7-646-3
Molleker R.[7]
Sachko V.[1]
6-46-2
Kivattsev K.[8]
Filip J.
6-16-4
Nicod J.
Soriano Barrera A.[5]
6-26-3
Gomez F.[4]
Damas M.
6-26-2
Debru G.[3]
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
6-16-0
Cias P.
Donski A.
7-617-67
Nicod J.
Soriano Barrera A.
6-26-3
Vrbensky M.[1]
Faria J.[9]
6-36-4
Q1
Laaksonen H.[4]
Mensik J.
2-66-26-4
Delbonis F.[3]
Squire H.
6-26-3
Domingues J.
Gengel M.[10]
4-66-16-2
Kuzmanov D.[2]
Andreozzi G.
6-16-3
Molleker R.
Lazarov A.[11]
7-54-67-65
Houkes M.
Mochizuki S.[5]
7-636-3
Moro Canas A.[12]
Barnat J.
7-57-5
Llamas Ruiz P.[7]
Rosol L.
2-66-36-4
Hrazdil J.
Sweeny D.[6]
6-26-4
Gaio F.
Yevseyev D.[9]
6-06-756-3
Choinski J.[1]
Harris B.
6-46-4
Laaksonen H.
Mensik J.
2-66-26-4
Andreozzi G.[6]
Manafov V.
6-26-4
Rybakov A.[11]
Rikl P.
7-657-5
Damm M.
Yevseyev D.[2]
6-36-2
Stodder T.[9]
Filip J.
3-66-46-4
Harris B.[8]
Barton H.
6-46-3
Santillan A.
Gengel M.[3]
6-26-0
Artnak B.
Paulson A.[12]
4-66-36-4
Rincon D.[5]
Brunclik P.
6-16-767-63
Elias G.[10]
Bolardt A.
6-27-5
Molleker R.[7]
Lomakin G.
6-36-3
Sachko V.[1]
Haerteis J.
5-76-26-1
Prihodko O.
Domingues J.[4]
6-45-76-3
Nicod J.
Milev Y.[12]
4-66-16-2
Kaliyanda Poonacha N.
Piraino G.[7]
7-56-3
Damas M.
Butvilas E.[11]
6-46-4
Filip J.
Cukierman D.[2]
6-36-3
Kivattsev K.[8]
Barnat J.
6-46-1
Donski A.
Potenza L.[10]
6-26-3
Cias P.
Merida Aguilar D.[6]
6-46-2
Gomez F.[4]
Prihodko O.
6-44-66-4
Faria J.[9]
Siniakov D.
6-16-4
Nicod J.
Milev Y.
4-66-16-2
Debru G.[3]
Metreveli A.
6-27-5
Vrbensky M.[1]
Kielan S.
6-26-4