Nick Hardt vs Lautaro Midon — Coquimbo CH Round of 32

Coquimbo CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Nick Hardt
DOM1
Nick Hardt
#275ATP
1473ELO
1460Clay ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 May 2023
clay
ARG
Lautaro Midon
1526ELO
1508Clay ELO
22 yrs · 180 cm
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLW
Hardt N.
6-4 6-3
Midon L.
Hardt N.
662
Midon L.
430

Nick Hardt defeated Lautaro Midon 6-4 6-3 in the Coquimbo CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Nick Hardt closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hardt N.serving51% hold

wins 51% of points on serve vs Midon L.

Midon L.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Hardt N.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hardt N.Midon L.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
58%
58%
Return points won·Even
42%
44%
Break points saved·Even
55%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.7
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 128). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hardt N.Midon L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
26
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
33
28
Break points won·Dominant
32
63
Deciding sets·Slight edge
55
62
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
66

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hardt N.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Midon L.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
4.8
Surface form
3.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
9.1
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hardt N.Midon L.
Freshness·Dominant
83
58

Hardt N.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 57 games (7d) · Midon L.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 89 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Reis Da Silva J.[8]
7-616-746-4
Semi-finals
Reis Da Silva J.[8]
Burruchaga R.[7]
6-26-4
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Seyboth Wild T.[2]
7-687-5
Quarter-finals
Burruchaga R.[7]
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
7-56-1
Seyboth Wild T.[2]
Alves M.
6-16-2
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Juarez F.
6-36-4
Reis Da Silva J.[8]
Hardt N.[1]
6-36-756-1
R16
Hardt N.[1]
Pereira J.
7-56-2
Reis Da Silva J.[8]
Boscardin Dias P.
6-26-2
Alves M.
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-13-66-3
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Comesana F.[4]
6-27-63
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
Huertas Del Pino A.
6-43-66-4
Burruchaga R.[7]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-2
Seyboth Wild T.[2]
Barrena A.
6-26-0
Juarez F.
Heide G.
7-56-3
R32
Heide G.
Torres J.[6]
6-17-5
Burruchaga R.[7]
Leite W.
6-36-3
Comesana F.[4]
Aboian L.
6-24-66-4
Alves M.
Casanova H.[5]
6-36-1
Barrena A.
Monzon I.
6-47-66
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
Lama G.
6-16-2
Dellien Velasco M.
Villanueva G.
6-36-4
Huertas Del Pino A.
Villalon N.
6-46-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.[3]
Aboian V.
6-46-4
Pereira J.
De La Fuente S.
6-26-3
Huertas Del Pino C.
Nunez D.
6-46-4
Hardt N.[1]
Midon L.
6-46-3
Juarez F.
Panta Herreros J.
6-06-2
Reis Da Silva J.[8]
Ribeiro E.
6-26-3
Boscardin Dias P.
Nakagawa N.
4-67-56-3
Seyboth Wild T.[2]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-16-2