Dominik Koepfer vs Norbert Gombos — Prague CH Round of 16

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER
Dominik Koepfer
#1085ATP
32 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 1 May 2023
clay
Norbert Gombos
SVK
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1455Clay ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
Koepfer D.
6-2 3-6 6-3
Gombos N.
Koepfer D.
6362
Gombos N.
2631

Dominik Koepfer defeated Norbert Gombos 6-2 3-6 6-3 in the Prague CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Norbert Gombos came in ranked #370, leading the head-to-head 1–0. Dominik Koepfer claimed a first win over Norbert Gombos in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Dominik Koepfer closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-07-02WimbledonQ3grassNorbert Gombos2-6 6-3 2-6 6-4 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Koepfer D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Gombos N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Koepfer D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Koepfer D.Gombos N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.3
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (111 vs 166). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Koepfer D.Gombos N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
71
41
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
83
Break points won·Clear edge
28
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
95
70
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Koepfer D.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Gombos N.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.3
Surface form
7.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0
Opponent rise
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Koepfer D.Gombos N.
Freshness·
—
79

Gombos N.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Stricker D.[7]
Ofner S.[8]
7-676-3
Mensik J.
Koepfer D.[6]
6-46-3
Molleker R.[4]
Debru G.
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Ofner S.[8]
Klein L.
7-640-66-3
Stricker D.[7]
Krajinovic F.[1]
7-55-76-3
Mensik J.
Moro Canas A.
6-27-5
Koepfer D.[6]
Kicker N.
6-46-3
Molleker R.[4]
Vacherot V.[8]
6-47-65
Debru G.
Sousa J.[5]
5-76-36-4
Quarter-finals
Krajinovic F.[1]
Koepfer D.
6-16-2
Klein L.
Kolar Z.
6-37-5
Ofner S.[8]
Barrios Vera T.
6-27-5
Stricker D.[7]
Svrcina D.
4-66-16-3
Kicker N.
Laaksonen H.
W/O
Koepfer D.[6]
Klein L.[4]
6-46-766-1
Moro Canas A.
Mochizuki S.
6-36-4
Mensik J.
Santillan A.
3-66-37-66
Debru G.
Kodat T.
7-646-736-4
Vacherot V.[8]
Paulson A.
7-656-2
Molleker R.[4]
Gomez F.
6-36-3
Sousa J.[5]
Darderi L.[3]
7-53-67-63
R16
Koepfer D.
Gombos N.
6-23-66-3
Klein L.
Agamenone F.
6-37-66
Ofner S.[8]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-2
Stricker D.[7]
Meligeni Alves F.
6-756-26-4
Krajinovic F.[1]
Gaio F.
6-24-66-4
Svrcina D.
Paulson A.
6-13-66-0
Barrios Vera T.
Kopriva V.
6-25-77-67
Kolar Z.
Machac T.[6]
7-56-3
Koepfer D.[6]
Furness E.
7-660-0
Santillan A.
Hardt N.
4-66-46-3
Mochizuki S.
Gombos N.[3]
7-687-62
Kicker N.
Fatic N.
7-56-4
Laaksonen H.
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-36-766-2
Mensik J.
Sachko V.
6-46-4
Moro Canas A.
Svajda Z.
6-42-66-4
Klein L.[4]
Andreozzi G.
5-76-36-3
Vacherot V.[8]
Mena F.
6-26-4
Sousa J.[5]
Forejtek J.
6-04-66-4
Darderi L.[3]
Vrbensky M.
6-46-1
Debru G.
Nicod J.
7-56-1
Gomez F.
Giustino L.
6-36-3
Molleker R.[4]
Chazal M.
6-26-2
Paulson A.
Erhard M.
6-36-3
Kodat T.
Laaksonen H.
6-36-3
Debru G.
Nicod J.
7-56-1
R32
Machac T.[6]
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-16-1
Kolar Z.
Bellier A.
3-66-37-65
Gaio F.
Kuzmanov D.
6-47-65
Gombos N.
Piros Z.[5]
2-2
Koepfer D.
Delbonis F.
6-16-4
Meligeni Alves F.
Martinez P.
6-23-0
Kopriva V.
Sachko V.
5-77-56-2
Paulson A.
Peniston R.
2-67-56-1
Ofner S.[8]
Demin Y.
6-46-756-1
Stricker D.[7]
Ivanovski K.
6-26-2
Ugo Carabelli C.
Sels J.
6-26-746-1
Barrios Vera T.
Albot R.[2]
6-36-3
Svrcina D.
Cerundolo J.[3]
6-36-1
Agamenone F.
Gaston H.[4]
7-57-5
Klein L.
Valkusz M.
6-41-66-1
Krajinovic F.[1]
Choinski J.
6-44-66-2
Moro Canas A.
Harris B.
6-23-66-0
Koepfer D.[6]
Elias G.
1-1
Mensik J.
Albot R.[1]
7-644-66-3
Fatic N.
Added D.
5-76-46-3
Laaksonen H.
Stricker D.[2]
7-54-66-1
Sachko V.
Geerts M.
6-16-1
Svajda Z.
Couacaud E.[5]
6-46-1
Furness E.
Kolar Z.
6-46-3
Kicker N.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-37-63
Andreozzi G.
Rincon D.
6-46-4
Hardt N.
Gaio F.
6-26-4
Klein L.[4]
Demin Y.
7-56-1
Gombos N.[3]
Molleker R.
6-46-4
Llamas Ruiz P.
Vesely J.
6-47-5
Santillan A.
Tseng C.[8]
6-36-0
Mochizuki S.
Vrbensky M.
7-56-3
Erhard M.
Maestrelli F.
7-605-76-3
Vacherot V.[8]
Kivattsev K.
6-46-4
Kodat T.
Hemery C.
6-41-66-2
Nicod J.
Barton H.
1-66-36-2
Vrbensky M.
Jorda Sanchis D.
6-37-5
Paulson A.
Cias P.
6-46-4
Forejtek J.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-43-66-4
Laaksonen H.
Bourgue M.[7]
4-67-636-2
Mena F.
Lopez Montagud C.
7-56-3
Giustino L.
Jianu F.
6-46-3
Chazal M.
Gengel M.
6-26-2
Gomez F.
Squire H.[6]
4-66-46-3
Sousa J.[5]
Royer V.
6-46-1
Darderi L.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-777-65
Debru G.
Neumayer L.[1]
2-66-36-4
Molleker R.[4]
Rosol L.
6-36-4
Nicod J.
Barton H.
1-66-36-2