Christopher Eubanks vs Brandon Holt — Gwangju CH Round of 16

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA2
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 May 2023
hard
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
Eubanks C.
6-2 6-1
Holt B.
Eubanks C.
662
Holt B.
210

Christopher Eubanks defeated Brandon Holt 6-2 6-1 in the Gwangju CH round of 16 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Eubanks C.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Holt B.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Eubanks C.Holt B.
1st serve in·Even
68%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
32%
39%
Break points saved·Even
63%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
10.6
4.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.2
1.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 189). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Eubanks C.Holt B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
50
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
96
85
Break points won·Dominant
3
31
Deciding sets·Clear edge
67
79
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
74
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Eubanks C.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Holt B.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.8Hard Elo 1493
Surface ELO
5.2+14 Hard Elo edge
4.8Overall Elo 1523
ELO gap
5.2Overall Elo 1537
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.8
Surface form
2.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.1
Minutes 14d
8.9
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[3]
Purcell M.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Purcell M.[1]
Polmans M.
6-06-2
Thompson J.[3]
Eubanks C.[2]
7-636-3
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[2]
Yunchaokete B.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Jung J.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Hijikata R.[6]
6-46-4
Purcell M.[1]
Gomez E.[5]
6-27-63
R16
Eubanks C.[2]
Holt B.
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.
Vukic A.[7]
6-47-64
Hijikata R.[6]
Tu L.
6-47-63
Jung J.
Chung Y.
3-66-36-4
Polmans M.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-37-65
Purcell M.[1]
Saville L.
6-26-2
Gomez E.[5]
Palan D.
6-36-2
Thompson J.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-26-4
R32
Chung Y.
Uchida K.
7-646-3
Duckworth J.[4]
Jasika O.
6-36-1
Yunchaokete B.
Sin S.
6-46-1
Gomez E.[5]
Celikbilek A.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.[6]
Diallo G.
6-26-4
Donskoy E.
Masur D.
6-36-1
Eubanks C.[2]
Harris L.
7-634-66-4
Holt B.
Ilkel C.
3-66-06-1
Vukic A.[7]
Shimabukuro S.
7-57-62
Thompson J.[3]
Park U.
6-16-736-0
Tu L.
Wu T.
6-36-2
Jung J.
Kudla D.[8]
6-36-716-3
Palan D.
Hsu Y.
6-26-3
Saville L.
Gojowczyk P.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[1]
Berankis R.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Shimizu Y.
2-67-56-4