Emilio Gomez vs Altug Celikbilek — Gwangju CH Round of 32

Gwangju CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ECU5
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 1 May 2023
hard
TUR
Altug Celikbilek
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLWWWL
Gomez E.
6-3 6-2
Celikbilek A.
Gomez E.
662
Celikbilek A.
320

Emilio Gomez defeated Altug Celikbilek 6-3 6-2 in the Gwangju CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Emilio Gomez came in defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Celikbilek A.

Celikbilek A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Serve advantage — Celikbilek A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Celikbilek A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.1
6.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 68). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Celikbilek A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
40
Break points saved·Even
77
73
Break points won·Clear edge
19
38
Deciding sets·Dominant
23
57
Tiebreaks·Dominant
79
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Celikbilek A.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
3.5
Surface form
3.4
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.8
Minutes 14d
8.9
4.0
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Thompson J.[3]
Purcell M.[1]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Purcell M.[1]
Polmans M.
6-06-2
Thompson J.[3]
Eubanks C.[2]
7-636-3
Quarter-finals
Eubanks C.[2]
Yunchaokete B.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Jung J.
6-46-3
Thompson J.[3]
Hijikata R.[6]
6-46-4
Purcell M.[1]
Gomez E.[5]
6-27-63
R16
Eubanks C.[2]
Holt B.
6-26-1
Yunchaokete B.
Vukic A.[7]
6-47-64
Hijikata R.[6]
Tu L.
6-47-63
Jung J.
Chung Y.
3-66-36-4
Polmans M.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-37-65
Purcell M.[1]
Saville L.
6-26-2
Gomez E.[5]
Palan D.
6-36-2
Thompson J.[3]
Donskoy E.
6-26-4
R32
Chung Y.
Uchida K.
7-646-3
Duckworth J.[4]
Jasika O.
6-36-1
Yunchaokete B.
Sin S.
6-46-1
Gomez E.[5]
Celikbilek A.
6-36-2
Hijikata R.[6]
Diallo G.
6-26-4
Donskoy E.
Masur D.
6-36-1
Eubanks C.[2]
Harris L.
7-634-66-4
Holt B.
Ilkel C.
3-66-06-1
Vukic A.[7]
Shimabukuro S.
7-57-62
Thompson J.[3]
Park U.
6-16-736-0
Tu L.
Wu T.
6-36-2
Jung J.
Kudla D.[8]
6-36-716-3
Palan D.
Hsu Y.
6-26-3
Saville L.
Gojowczyk P.
6-36-4
Purcell M.[1]
Berankis R.
6-36-2
Polmans M.
Shimizu Y.
2-67-56-4