Alexander Ritschard vs Nino Serdarusic — Rome CH Round of 32

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SUI
Alexander Ritschard
#575ATP
1528ELO
1557Clay ELO
32 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
CRO
Nino Serdarusic
#1471ATP
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
Ritschard A.
7-6 7-5
Serdarusic N.
Ritschard A.
7772
Serdarusic N.
6350

Alexander Ritschard defeated Nino Serdarusic 7-6 7-5 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ritschard A.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Serdarusic N.

Serdarusic N.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Ritschard A.

Serve advantage — Ritschard A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ritschard A.Serdarusic N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.3
4.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (158 vs 93). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ritschard A.Serdarusic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
36
8
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
66
Break points won·Slight edge
14
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
40
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
60
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Ritschard A.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Serdarusic N.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
4.1
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.5
Minutes 14d
6.2
4.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.
De Jong J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
De Jong J.
Cobolli F.
7-56-3
Nagal S.
De Loore J.[8]
2-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.
Trungelliti M.
7-57-5
De Jong J.
Agamenone F.[2]
6-36-4
Nagal S.
Houkes M.
7-56-0
De Loore J.[8]
Ritschard A.
5-76-16-4
R16
Agamenone F.[2]
Roca Batalla O.
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.
Fonio G.
2-66-16-2
Cobolli F.
Forti F.
7-56-1
Houkes M.
Sels J.[5]
6-47-65
De Loore J.[8]
Piraino G.
6-766-16-4
Ritschard A.
Weis A.
7-56-2
De Jong J.
Mager G.
6-06-3
Nagal S.
Tabacco F.
6-36-0
R32
Agamenone F.[2]
Caruso S.
6-36-4
Fonio G.
Bellucci M.[3]
6-36-4
Ritschard A.
Serdarusic N.
7-637-5
Piraino G.
Fatic N.
5-0
Tabacco F.
Andreev A.
3-0
De Jong J.
Gengel M.
6-36-2
Weis A.
Marozsan F.[1]
6-46-4
Nagal S.
Maestrelli F.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Neuchrist M.[7]
7-646-4
Roca Batalla O.
Damas M.
6-16-1
Trungelliti M.
Arnaboldi F.
6-46-3
De Loore J.[8]
Geerts M.
6-26-2
Houkes M.
Vacherot V.
4-66-36-4
Sels J.[5]
Jianu F.
7-56-3
Forti F.
Durasovic V.
6-36-3
Cobolli F.
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-6104-67-61