Thiago Seyboth Wild vs Mariano Navone — Buenos Aires CH Semi-final

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Thiago Seyboth Wild
BRA8
Thiago Seyboth Wild
#243ATP
1532ELO
1516Clay ELO
26 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
Mariano Navone
ARG7
Mariano Navone
#38ATP
1822ELO
1800Clay ELO
$722kYTD
$3.1MCAREER
25 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWWWL
Seyboth Wild T.
6-2 6-3
Navone M.
Seyboth Wild T.
662
Navone M.
230

Thiago Seyboth Wild defeated Mariano Navone 6-2 6-3 in the Buenos Aires CH semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Mariano Navone came in ranked #38, leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's final, but Thiago Seyboth Wild had been the form player, winning 7 of their last 8 on clay. Thiago Seyboth Wild claimed a first win over Mariano Navone in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-04-15BucharestR16clayMariano Navone6-3 2-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Seyboth Wild T.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Navone M.

Navone M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Seyboth Wild T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Seyboth Wild T.Navone M.
—
Serve
0
—
Return
95

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Seyboth Wild T.Navone M.
1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.0
1.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.8
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seyboth Wild T.Navone M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
27
75
Break points saved·Slight edge
93
86
Break points won·Dominant
25
90
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
77
Tiebreaks·Dominant
16
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Seyboth Wild T.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Navone M.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
1.7Clay Elo 1516
Surface ELO
8.3+284 Clay Elo edge
1.8Overall Elo 1532
ELO gap
8.2Overall Elo 1822
0.0
H2H
10.0
8.6
Surface form
3.7
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.7
Minutes 14d
7.8
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
Opponent rise
2.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Seyboth Wild T.Navone M.
Freshness·Slight edge
84
94

Seyboth Wild T.: 5 days rest · 3 matches, 52 games (7d) · Navone M.: 11 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-3
Navone M.
Coria F.[1]
2-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Navone M.[7]
6-26-3
Darderi L.[3]
Collarini A.[1]
4-67-656-2
Navone M.
Darderi L.
2-66-47-5
Coria F.[1]
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Casanova H.
6-36-2
Darderi L.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Collarini A.[1]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Navone M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-37-62
Darderi L.
Cerundolo J.[2]
6-37-5
Navone M.
Agamenone F.
6-36-2
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Comesana F.[7]
7-654-67-63
Coria F.[1]
Choinski J.[8]
5-77-636-3
R16
Collarini A.[1]
Comesana F.
6-36-4
Navone M.[7]
Torres J.
7-50-67-5
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-726-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Aboian V.
6-36-4
Darderi L.[3]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-26-0
Villanueva G.
Hardt N.[6]
7-51-67-5
Burruchaga R.
Heide G.
6-16-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-13-66-1
Choinski J.[8]
Dellien H.
6-40-0
Cerundolo J.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-24-66-4
Navone M.
Elias G.
3-66-47-63
Agamenone F.
Villanueva G.
7-626-2
Comesana F.[7]
Kovalik J.
6-736-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Coria F.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-3
Darderi L.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-34-66-4
R32
Villanueva G.
Lama G.
7-667-62
Aboian V.
Pereira J.
3-66-13-0
Navone M.[7]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-36-2
Heide G.
Kestelboim M.
6-46-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Leite W.
6-36-2
Comesana F.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-2
Hardt N.[6]
Midon L.
6-46-4
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-26-1
Casanova H.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Barrena A.
6-06-4
Darderi L.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Collarini A.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-27-5
Burruchaga R.
Farjat T.
6-26-1
Huertas Del Pino C.
Otegui J.
6-46-2
Pellegrino A.
Andreozzi G.
7-56-2
Kopriva V.[5]
Svrcina D.
7-57-63
Cerundolo J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Villanueva G.
Torres J.
2-66-26-3
Agamenone F.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-43-67-5
Comesana F.[7]
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Kovalik J.
Neumayer L.
6-756-46-2
Olivo R.
Burruchaga R.
6-06-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Delbonis F.
6-36-4
Choinski J.[8]
Monteiro T.
6-31-66-3
Dellien H.
Olivieri G.
5-76-47-65
Coria F.[1]
Ficovich J.
7-642-66-3
Darderi L.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-26-4
Elias G.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
4-66-27-5
Navone M.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Bagnis F.
6-757-57-62