Denis Kudla vs Marc Polmans — Seoul CH Round of 16

Seoul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA8
Denis Kudla
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
hard
Marc Polmans
AUS
Marc Polmans
#344ATP
1449ELO
1414Hard ELO
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWWL
Kudla D.
5-7 6-4 6-3
Polmans M.
Kudla D.
5662
Polmans M.
7431

Denis Kudla defeated Marc Polmans 5-7 6-4 6-3 in the Seoul CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Denis Kudla came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Denis Kudla extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-01-14Australian OpenR128hardDenis Kudla5-7 1-6 6-2 6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Kudla D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Polmans M.

Polmans M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kudla D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kudla D.Polmans M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.7
4.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.6
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (101 vs 153). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kudla D.Polmans M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
50
23
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
79
Break points won·Slight edge
19
10
Deciding sets·Dominant
82
31
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
30
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kudla D.
4.1
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Polmans M.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.5
Surface form
4.3
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.7
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kudla D.Polmans M.
Freshness·
—
100

Polmans M.: 20 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Yunchaokete B.
Vukic A.[7]
7-646-4
Semi-finals
Vukic A.[7]
Chung Y.
7-656-1
Yunchaokete B.
Uchiyama Y.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Yunchaokete B.
Hong S.
6-46-4
Vukic A.[7]
Eubanks C.[2]
7-56-3
Chung Y.
Hijikata R.[6]
6-26-3
Uchiyama Y.
Kudla D.[8]
6-34-66-1
R16
Chung Y.
Thompson J.[3]
6-46-3
Uchiyama Y.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-46-2
Vukic A.[7]
Berankis R.
6-36-756-1
Yunchaokete B.
Gomez E.[5]
6-46-716-3
Hong S.
Purcell M.[1]
6-16-3
Hijikata R.[6]
Donskoy E.
6-36-4
Eubanks C.[2]
Diallo G.
2-66-36-2
Kudla D.[8]
Polmans M.
5-76-46-3
R32
Berankis R.
Ilkel C.
6-726-26-4
Vukic A.[7]
Harris L.
7-637-60
Donskoy E.
Holt B.
4-66-46-2
Yunchaokete B.
Celikbilek A.
3-66-36-1
Eubanks C.[2]
Shimizu Y.
6-33-67-5
Diallo G.
Hsu Y.
6-26-3
Gomez E.[5]
Tu L.
7-647-5
Kudla D.[8]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-0
Chung Y.
Gojowczyk P.
6-26-3
Hong S.
Ito T.
6-36-2
Purcell M.[1]
Nam J.
6-36-4
Hijikata R.[6]
Shimabukuro S.
6-47-63
Uchiyama Y.
Mukund S.
6-46-7116-0
Duckworth J.[4]
Lee D.
7-641-66-1
Polmans M.
Lee J.
6-36-2
Thompson J.[3]
Chung H.
6-26-4