Patrick Kypson vs Nicolas Kicker — Savannah CH Quarter-final

Savannah CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Patrick Kypson
USA
Patrick Kypson
#113ATP
1641ELO
1555Clay ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
Nicolas Kicker
ARG4
Nicolas Kicker
#327ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Kypson P.
6-2 6-3
Kicker N.
Kypson P.
662
Kicker N.
230

Patrick Kypson defeated Nicolas Kicker 6-2 6-3 in the Savannah CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Patrick Kypson came in ranked #113.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kypson P.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Kicker N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Serve advantage — Kypson P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kypson P.Kicker N.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
66%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.3
1.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (194 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kypson P.Kicker N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
42
30
Break points saved·Dominant
93
56
Break points won·Even
41
45
Deciding sets·Clear edge
17
30
Tiebreaks·Dominant
77
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kypson P.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Kicker N.
5.1
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+182 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Clay Elo 1373
8.4Overall Elo 1641
ELO gap
1.6Overall Elo 1385
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.0
Surface form
3.3
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
6.9
Minutes 14d
9.3
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kypson P.Kicker N.
Freshness·Slight edge
92
100

Kypson P.: 10 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Kicker N.: 16 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Boyer T.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Kypson P.
6-34-66-4
Boyer T.
Hemery C.
2-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Dougaz A.[5]
6-33-66-3
Hemery C.
Bergs Z.[1]
6-42-66-2
Kypson P.
Kicker N.[4]
6-26-3
Boyer T.
Krueger M.[7]
6-46-1
R16
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Echargui M.
0-66-36-4
Dougaz A.[5]
Gomez F.
7-636-4
Kypson P.
Zhu E.
4-66-26-1
Bergs Z.[1]
Damm M.
3-67-636-3
Kicker N.[4]
Martineau M.
6-36-4
Krueger M.[7]
Rybakov A.
6-41-66-0
Boyer T.
Alves M.
6-16-4
Hemery C.
Fratangelo B.
7-616-3
R32
Dougaz A.[5]
Kodat T.
6-26-3
Martineau M.
Blanch U.
6-43-66-4
Kypson P.
Michelsen A.[8]
4-66-37-65
Hemery C.
Galarneau A.[6]
6-787-647-64
Fratangelo B.
Jacquet K.
6-26-0
Bergs Z.[1]
Tomic B.
6-36-3
Boyer T.
Couacaud E.[3]
6-26-3
Alves M.
Sinclair C.
6-27-61
Rybakov A.
Chappell N.
6-26-3
Zhu E.
Arnaboldi A.
6-44-66-1
Krueger M.[7]
Kuzuhara B.
7-57-613
Damm M.
Yevseyev D.
6-16-4
Kicker N.[4]
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-1
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Crawford O.
6-16-2
Gomez F.
Ejupovic E.
5-76-26-4
Echargui M.
Statham J.
6-46-4
Krueger M.
Kuzuhara B.
7-57-613