Jesper De Jong vs Gianluca Mager — Rome CH Round of 16

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Jesper De Jong
NED
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
ITA
Gianluca Mager
#1223ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
De Jong J.
6-0 6-3
Mager G.
De Jong J.
662
Mager G.
030

Jesper De Jong defeated Gianluca Mager 6-0 6-3 in the Rome CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Mager G.

Mager G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Serve advantage — De Jong J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Jong J.Mager G.
49
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Mager G.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.7
5.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 105). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Mager G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
40
Break points saved·Even
90
86
Break points won·Dominant
37
4
Deciding sets·Even
69
66
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
57
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mager G.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
4.8
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
8.5
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Mager G.
Freshness·
92
—

De Jong J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.
De Jong J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
De Jong J.
Cobolli F.
7-56-3
Nagal S.
De Loore J.[8]
2-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.
Trungelliti M.
7-57-5
De Jong J.
Agamenone F.[2]
6-36-4
Nagal S.
Houkes M.
7-56-0
De Loore J.[8]
Ritschard A.
5-76-16-4
R16
Agamenone F.[2]
Roca Batalla O.
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.
Fonio G.
2-66-16-2
Cobolli F.
Forti F.
7-56-1
Houkes M.
Sels J.[5]
6-47-65
De Loore J.[8]
Piraino G.
6-766-16-4
Ritschard A.
Weis A.
7-56-2
De Jong J.
Mager G.
6-06-3
Nagal S.
Tabacco F.
6-36-0
R32
Agamenone F.[2]
Caruso S.
6-36-4
Fonio G.
Bellucci M.[3]
6-36-4
Ritschard A.
Serdarusic N.
7-637-5
Piraino G.
Fatic N.
5-0
Tabacco F.
Andreev A.
3-0
De Jong J.
Gengel M.
6-36-2
Weis A.
Marozsan F.[1]
6-46-4
Nagal S.
Maestrelli F.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Neuchrist M.[7]
7-646-4
Roca Batalla O.
Damas M.
6-16-1
Trungelliti M.
Arnaboldi F.
6-46-3
De Loore J.[8]
Geerts M.
6-26-2
Houkes M.
Vacherot V.
4-66-36-4
Sels J.[5]
Jianu F.
7-56-3
Forti F.
Durasovic V.
6-36-3
Cobolli F.
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-6104-67-61