Emilio Gomez vs Li Tu — Seoul CH Round of 32

Seoul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ECU5
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
hard
AUS
Li Tu
#464ATP
1488ELO
1471Hard ELO
30 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWW
Gomez E.
7-6 7-5
Tu L.
Gomez E.
7772
Tu L.
6450

Emilio Gomez defeated Li Tu 7-6 7-5 in the Seoul CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gomez E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Tu L.

Tu L.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Serve advantage — Tu L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gomez E.Tu L.
1st serve in·Even
60%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
67%
73%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
59%
64%
Return points won·Even
36%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.2
6.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (55 vs 184). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gomez E.Tu L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
32
27
Break points saved·Slight edge
77
82
Break points won·Slight edge
19
8
Deciding sets·Even
23
20
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
79
64

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gomez E.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Tu L.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.3
Surface form
1.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
7.4
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Yunchaokete B.
Vukic A.[7]
7-646-4
Semi-finals
Vukic A.[7]
Chung Y.
7-656-1
Yunchaokete B.
Uchiyama Y.
7-646-4
Quarter-finals
Yunchaokete B.
Hong S.
6-46-4
Vukic A.[7]
Eubanks C.[2]
7-56-3
Chung Y.
Hijikata R.[6]
6-26-3
Uchiyama Y.
Kudla D.[8]
6-34-66-1
R16
Chung Y.
Thompson J.[3]
6-46-3
Uchiyama Y.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-46-2
Vukic A.[7]
Berankis R.
6-36-756-1
Yunchaokete B.
Gomez E.[5]
6-46-716-3
Hong S.
Purcell M.[1]
6-16-3
Hijikata R.[6]
Donskoy E.
6-36-4
Eubanks C.[2]
Diallo G.
2-66-36-2
Kudla D.[8]
Polmans M.
5-76-46-3
R32
Berankis R.
Ilkel C.
6-726-26-4
Vukic A.[7]
Harris L.
7-637-60
Donskoy E.
Holt B.
4-66-46-2
Yunchaokete B.
Celikbilek A.
3-66-36-1
Eubanks C.[2]
Shimizu Y.
6-33-67-5
Diallo G.
Hsu Y.
6-26-3
Gomez E.[5]
Tu L.
7-647-5
Kudla D.[8]
Kwiatkowski T.
6-16-0
Chung Y.
Gojowczyk P.
6-26-3
Hong S.
Ito T.
6-36-2
Purcell M.[1]
Nam J.
6-36-4
Hijikata R.[6]
Shimabukuro S.
6-47-63
Uchiyama Y.
Mukund S.
6-46-7116-0
Duckworth J.[4]
Lee D.
7-641-66-1
Polmans M.
Lee J.
6-36-2
Thompson J.[3]
Chung H.
6-26-4