Jesper De Jong vs Marek Gengel — Rome CH Round of 32

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jesper De Jong
NED
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
Marek Gengel
CZE
Marek Gengel
#373ATP
1411ELO
1260Clay ELO
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWWLWWW
De Jong J.
6-3 6-2
Gengel M.
De Jong J.
662
Gengel M.
320

Jesper De Jong defeated Marek Gengel 6-3 6-2 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Gengel M.

Gengel M.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Serve advantage — De Jong J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Jong J.Gengel M.
49
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Gengel M.
1st serve in·Even
59%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
46%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.7
5.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 88). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Gengel M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
11
Break points saved·Dominant
90
35
Break points won·Dominant
37
11
Deciding sets·Clear edge
69
53
Tiebreaks·Dominant
57
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Gengel M.
4.3
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
9.7+436 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.3Clay Elo 1260
7.8Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1411
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
2.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
Context
7.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Gengel M.
Freshness·
78
—

De Jong J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.
De Jong J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
De Jong J.
Cobolli F.
7-56-3
Nagal S.
De Loore J.[8]
2-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.
Trungelliti M.
7-57-5
De Jong J.
Agamenone F.[2]
6-36-4
Nagal S.
Houkes M.
7-56-0
De Loore J.[8]
Ritschard A.
5-76-16-4
R16
Agamenone F.[2]
Roca Batalla O.
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.
Fonio G.
2-66-16-2
Cobolli F.
Forti F.
7-56-1
Houkes M.
Sels J.[5]
6-47-65
De Loore J.[8]
Piraino G.
6-766-16-4
Ritschard A.
Weis A.
7-56-2
De Jong J.
Mager G.
6-06-3
Nagal S.
Tabacco F.
6-36-0
R32
Agamenone F.[2]
Caruso S.
6-36-4
Fonio G.
Bellucci M.[3]
6-36-4
Ritschard A.
Serdarusic N.
7-637-5
Piraino G.
Fatic N.
5-0
Tabacco F.
Andreev A.
3-0
De Jong J.
Gengel M.
6-36-2
Weis A.
Marozsan F.[1]
6-46-4
Nagal S.
Maestrelli F.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Neuchrist M.[7]
7-646-4
Roca Batalla O.
Damas M.
6-16-1
Trungelliti M.
Arnaboldi F.
6-46-3
De Loore J.[8]
Geerts M.
6-26-2
Houkes M.
Vacherot V.
4-66-36-4
Sels J.[5]
Jianu F.
7-56-3
Forti F.
Durasovic V.
6-36-3
Cobolli F.
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-6104-67-61