Joris De Loore vs Michael Geerts — Rome CH Round of 32

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
BEL8
Joris De Loore
#1076ATP
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
Michael Geerts
BEL
Michael Geerts
#328ATP
1400ELO
1348Clay ELO
31 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
De Loore J.
6-2 6-2
Geerts M.
De Loore J.
662
Geerts M.
220

Joris De Loore defeated Michael Geerts 6-2 6-2 in the Rome CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Michael Geerts came in ranked #328, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Loore J.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Geerts M.

Geerts M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs De Loore J.

Serve advantage — De Loore J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
De Loore J.Geerts M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
76%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
52%
Service points won·Even
67%
63%
Return points won·Even
35%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
4.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (106 vs 191). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Loore J.Geerts M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
23
9
Break points saved·Even
84
82
Break points won·Even
6
3
Deciding sets·Even
11
8
Tiebreaks·Dominant
63
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Loore J.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Geerts M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
3.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.8
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.
De Jong J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
De Jong J.
Cobolli F.
7-56-3
Nagal S.
De Loore J.[8]
2-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.
Trungelliti M.
7-57-5
De Jong J.
Agamenone F.[2]
6-36-4
Nagal S.
Houkes M.
7-56-0
De Loore J.[8]
Ritschard A.
5-76-16-4
R16
Agamenone F.[2]
Roca Batalla O.
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.
Fonio G.
2-66-16-2
Cobolli F.
Forti F.
7-56-1
Houkes M.
Sels J.[5]
6-47-65
De Loore J.[8]
Piraino G.
6-766-16-4
Ritschard A.
Weis A.
7-56-2
De Jong J.
Mager G.
6-06-3
Nagal S.
Tabacco F.
6-36-0
R32
Agamenone F.[2]
Caruso S.
6-36-4
Fonio G.
Bellucci M.[3]
6-36-4
Ritschard A.
Serdarusic N.
7-637-5
Piraino G.
Fatic N.
5-0
Tabacco F.
Andreev A.
3-0
De Jong J.
Gengel M.
6-36-2
Weis A.
Marozsan F.[1]
6-46-4
Nagal S.
Maestrelli F.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Neuchrist M.[7]
7-646-4
Roca Batalla O.
Damas M.
6-16-1
Trungelliti M.
Arnaboldi F.
6-46-3
De Loore J.[8]
Geerts M.
6-26-2
Houkes M.
Vacherot V.
4-66-36-4
Sels J.[5]
Jianu F.
7-56-3
Forti F.
Durasovic V.
6-36-3
Cobolli F.
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-6104-67-61