Ivan Gakhov vs Lukas Rosol — Ostrava CH Round of 32

Ostrava CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Ivan Gakhov
RUS2
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
Gakhov I.
6-4 3-6 6-1
Rosol L.
Gakhov I.
6362
Rosol L.
4611

Ivan Gakhov defeated Lukas Rosol 6-4 3-6 6-1 in the Ostrava CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Lukas Rosol came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 32. Ivan Gakhov claimed a first win over Lukas Rosol in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Ivan Gakhov came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-10-15MoscowQ1hardLukas Rosol6-3 6-3
2018-05-21GenevaQ1clayLukas Rosol6-1 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Rosol L.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Serve advantage — Gakhov I.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Rosol L.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
34%
Break points saved·Clear edge
62%
48%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 13). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Rosol L.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
34
51
Break points saved·Slight edge
82
89
Break points won·Slight edge
9
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
59
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
72

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Gakhov I.
6.8
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Rosol L.
5.6
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
7.7
Surface form
4.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 8
Fatigue & Travel
5.7
Minutes 14d
0.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kolar Z.
Valkusz M.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Valkusz M.
Bonadio R.[6]
6-06-4
Kolar Z.
Mochizuki S.
6-32-66-2
Quarter-finals
Valkusz M.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-646-1
Bonadio R.[6]
Vesely J.
6-756-36-4
Kolar Z.
Onclin G.
6-22-66-4
Mochizuki S.
Dzumhur D.[8]
5-76-26-3
R16
Ferreira Silva F.
Krutykh O.[7]
6-16-4
Kolar Z.
Kopriva V.[3]
6-26-1
Mochizuki S.
Mensik J.
1-66-27-64
Mochizuki S.
Mensik J.
1-66-27-64
Vesely J.
Gakhov I.[2]
2-66-36-4
Bonadio R.[6]
Mayot H.
6-17-63
Onclin G.
Svrcina D.[9]
6-06-3
Valkusz M.
Blancaneaux G.[4]
6-36-4
Dzumhur D.[8]
Monfils G.
6-36-4
R32
Monfils G.
Furness E.
6-32-0
Kopriva V.[3]
Added D.
7-54-66-3
Krutykh O.[7]
Ionel N.
6-16-2
Mochizuki S.
Andreozzi G.
2-66-46-1
Bonadio R.[6]
Marti Pujolras A.
6-46-3
Vesely J.
Giustino L.
6-36-776-2
Mensik J.
Peniston R.
6-26-3
Mensik J.
Peniston R.[1]
6-26-3
Mayot H.
Sultanov K.
6-26-0
Gakhov I.[2]
Rosol L.
6-43-66-1
Kolar Z.
Zekic M.
7-696-2
Dzumhur D.[8]
Squire H.
6-36-0
Svrcina D.[9]
Molleker R.
6-02-66-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Collignon R.
6-46-4
Blancaneaux G.[4]
Martin Tiffon P.
6-46-3
Valkusz M.
Rikl P.
6-34-66-1
Onclin G.
Sachko V.
4-66-46-2