Gabriele Piraino vs Nerman Fatic — Rome CH Round of 32

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA
Gabriele Piraino
#375ATP
1254ELO
1248Clay ELO
22 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
0 — 0
Sets
Retired
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
BIH
Nerman Fatic
#396ATP
1496ELO
1478Clay ELO
31 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWLW
Piraino G.
5-0
Fatic N.
Piraino G.
5–
Fatic N.
0–

Gabriele Piraino advanced when Nerman Fatic retired 5-0 in the Rome CH round of 32.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piraino G.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Fatic N.

Fatic N.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Piraino G.

Serve advantage — Fatic N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piraino G.Fatic N.
1st serve in·Even
60%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.0
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (67 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piraino G.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
Fatic N.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.7Clay Elo 1248
Surface ELO
7.3+231 Clay Elo edge
2.6Overall Elo 1254
ELO gap
7.4Overall Elo 1496
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
4.8
4.0
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piraino G.Fatic N.
Freshness·
100
—

Piraino G.: 21 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.
De Jong J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
De Jong J.
Cobolli F.
7-56-3
Nagal S.
De Loore J.[8]
2-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.
Trungelliti M.
7-57-5
De Jong J.
Agamenone F.[2]
6-36-4
Nagal S.
Houkes M.
7-56-0
De Loore J.[8]
Ritschard A.
5-76-16-4
R16
Agamenone F.[2]
Roca Batalla O.
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.
Fonio G.
2-66-16-2
Cobolli F.
Forti F.
7-56-1
Houkes M.
Sels J.[5]
6-47-65
De Loore J.[8]
Piraino G.
6-766-16-4
Ritschard A.
Weis A.
7-56-2
De Jong J.
Mager G.
6-06-3
Nagal S.
Tabacco F.
6-36-0
R32
Agamenone F.[2]
Caruso S.
6-36-4
Fonio G.
Bellucci M.[3]
6-36-4
Ritschard A.
Serdarusic N.
7-637-5
Piraino G.
Fatic N.
5-0
Tabacco F.
Andreev A.
3-0
De Jong J.
Gengel M.
6-36-2
Weis A.
Marozsan F.[1]
6-46-4
Nagal S.
Maestrelli F.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Neuchrist M.[7]
7-646-4
Roca Batalla O.
Damas M.
6-16-1
Trungelliti M.
Arnaboldi F.
6-46-3
De Loore J.[8]
Geerts M.
6-26-2
Houkes M.
Vacherot V.
4-66-36-4
Sels J.[5]
Jianu F.
7-56-3
Forti F.
Durasovic V.
6-36-3
Cobolli F.
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-6104-67-61