Luciano Darderi vs Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna — Buenos Aires CH Quarter-final

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Luciano Darderi
ITA3
Luciano Darderi
#18ATP
1835ELO
1836Clay ELO
$1.3MYTD
$4.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna
ARG
Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna
1331ELO
1322Clay ELO
26 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLWLL
Darderi L.
6-3 6-2
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Darderi L.
662
Rodriguez Taverna S.
320

Luciano Darderi defeated Santiago Fa Rodriguez Taverna 6-3 6-2 in the Buenos Aires CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Luciano Darderi came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Darderi L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Rodriguez Taverna S.

Rodriguez Taverna S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Darderi L.

Serve advantage — Darderi L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Darderi L.Rodriguez Taverna S.
46
Serve
—
67
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Darderi L.Rodriguez Taverna S.
1st serve in·Even
58%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.4
3.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.4
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Darderi L.Rodriguez Taverna S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
78
38
Break points saved·Clear edge
94
72
Break points won·Dominant
50
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
93
76
Tiebreaks·Dominant
94
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Darderi L.
7.2
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Rodriguez Taverna S.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
10.0+514 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.0Clay Elo 1322
10.0Overall Elo 1835
ELO gap
0.0Overall Elo 1331
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.3
Surface form
5.2
0.0Lost last 3
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
6.6
7.0
3-set count
7.0
6.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Darderi L.Rodriguez Taverna S.
Freshness·Clear edge
100
82

Darderi L.: 15 days rest · Rodriguez Taverna S.: 5 days rest · 1 match, 34 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-3
Navone M.
Coria F.[1]
2-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Navone M.[7]
6-26-3
Darderi L.[3]
Collarini A.[1]
4-67-656-2
Navone M.
Darderi L.
2-66-47-5
Coria F.[1]
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Casanova H.
6-36-2
Darderi L.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Collarini A.[1]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Navone M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-37-62
Darderi L.
Cerundolo J.[2]
6-37-5
Navone M.
Agamenone F.
6-36-2
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Comesana F.[7]
7-654-67-63
Coria F.[1]
Choinski J.[8]
5-77-636-3
R16
Collarini A.[1]
Comesana F.
6-36-4
Navone M.[7]
Torres J.
7-50-67-5
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-726-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Aboian V.
6-36-4
Darderi L.[3]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-26-0
Villanueva G.
Hardt N.[6]
7-51-67-5
Burruchaga R.
Heide G.
6-16-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-13-66-1
Choinski J.[8]
Dellien H.
6-40-0
Cerundolo J.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-24-66-4
Navone M.
Elias G.
3-66-47-63
Agamenone F.
Villanueva G.
7-626-2
Comesana F.[7]
Kovalik J.
6-736-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Coria F.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-3
Darderi L.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-34-66-4
R32
Villanueva G.
Lama G.
7-667-62
Aboian V.
Pereira J.
3-66-13-0
Navone M.[7]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-36-2
Heide G.
Kestelboim M.
6-46-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Leite W.
6-36-2
Comesana F.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-2
Hardt N.[6]
Midon L.
6-46-4
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-26-1
Casanova H.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Barrena A.
6-06-4
Darderi L.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Collarini A.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-27-5
Burruchaga R.
Farjat T.
6-26-1
Huertas Del Pino C.
Otegui J.
6-46-2
Pellegrino A.
Andreozzi G.
7-56-2
Kopriva V.[5]
Svrcina D.
7-57-63
Cerundolo J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Villanueva G.
Torres J.
2-66-26-3
Agamenone F.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-43-67-5
Comesana F.[7]
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Kovalik J.
Neumayer L.
6-756-46-2
Olivo R.
Burruchaga R.
6-06-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Delbonis F.
6-36-4
Choinski J.[8]
Monteiro T.
6-31-66-3
Dellien H.
Olivieri G.
5-76-47-65
Coria F.[1]
Ficovich J.
7-642-66-3
Darderi L.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-26-4
Elias G.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
4-66-27-5
Navone M.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Bagnis F.
6-757-57-62