Martin Damm vs Denis Yevseyev — Savannah CH Round of 32

Savannah CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Martin Damm
USA
Martin Damm
#104ATP
1706ELO
1535Clay ELO
$338kYTD
$910kCAREER
22 yrs · 203 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
Denis Yevseyev
KAZ
Denis Yevseyev
#445ATP
1375ELO
1341Clay ELO
33 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWLW
Damm M.
6-1 6-4
Yevseyev D.
Damm M.
662
Yevseyev D.
140

Martin Damm defeated Denis Yevseyev 6-1 6-4 in the Savannah CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Martin Damm came in ranked #104.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Damm M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Yevseyev D.

Yevseyev D.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Damm M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Damm M.Yevseyev D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
79%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
41%
Break points saved·Clear edge
66%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
12.6
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (147 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Damm M.Yevseyev D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
26
0
Break points saved·Dominant
93
15
Break points won·Clear edge
1
21
Deciding sets·Slight edge
5
12
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Damm M.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Yevseyev D.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.5+194 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.5Clay Elo 1341
8.5Overall Elo 1706
ELO gap
1.5Overall Elo 1375
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.4
Surface form
5.9
Fatigue & Travel
5.3
Minutes 14d
6.7
4.0
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
7.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Damm M.Yevseyev D.
Freshness·Dominant
97
68

Damm M.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Yevseyev D.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Boyer T.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Kypson P.
6-34-66-4
Boyer T.
Hemery C.
2-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Dougaz A.[5]
6-33-66-3
Hemery C.
Bergs Z.[1]
6-42-66-2
Kypson P.
Kicker N.[4]
6-26-3
Boyer T.
Krueger M.[7]
6-46-1
R16
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Echargui M.
0-66-36-4
Dougaz A.[5]
Gomez F.
7-636-4
Kypson P.
Zhu E.
4-66-26-1
Bergs Z.[1]
Damm M.
3-67-636-3
Kicker N.[4]
Martineau M.
6-36-4
Krueger M.[7]
Rybakov A.
6-41-66-0
Boyer T.
Alves M.
6-16-4
Hemery C.
Fratangelo B.
7-616-3
R32
Dougaz A.[5]
Kodat T.
6-26-3
Martineau M.
Blanch U.
6-43-66-4
Kypson P.
Michelsen A.[8]
4-66-37-65
Hemery C.
Galarneau A.[6]
6-787-647-64
Fratangelo B.
Jacquet K.
6-26-0
Bergs Z.[1]
Tomic B.
6-36-3
Boyer T.
Couacaud E.[3]
6-26-3
Alves M.
Sinclair C.
6-27-61
Rybakov A.
Chappell N.
6-26-3
Zhu E.
Arnaboldi A.
6-44-66-1
Krueger M.[7]
Kuzuhara B.
7-57-613
Damm M.
Yevseyev D.
6-16-4
Kicker N.[4]
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-1
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Crawford O.
6-16-2
Gomez F.
Ejupovic E.
5-76-26-4
Echargui M.
Statham J.
6-46-4
Krueger M.
Kuzuhara B.
7-57-613