Hernan Casanova vs Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva — Buenos Aires CH Round of 16

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Hernan Casanova
ARG
Hernan Casanova
#337ATP
1393ELO
1381Clay ELO
32 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
BRA
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
#250ATP
1486ELO
1470Clay ELO
$76kYTD
$371kCAREER
26 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Casanova H.
6-1 6-7 6-4
Reis Da Silva J.
Casanova H.
66262
Reis Da Silva J.
17741

Hernan Casanova defeated Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva 6-1 6-7 6-4 in the Buenos Aires CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva came in ranked #250, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Hernan Casanova came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 6–7 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Casanova H.serving56% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Reis Da Silva J.

Reis Da Silva J.serving59% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Casanova H.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Casanova H.Reis Da Silva J.
1st serve in·Clear edge
76%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
57%
60%
Return points won·Even
43%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.5
2.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (115 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Casanova H.Reis Da Silva J.
Clutch Rating·Even
8
12
Break points saved·Dominant
24
49
Break points won·Clear edge
22
43
Deciding sets·Clear edge
32
9
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
34
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Casanova H.
4.9
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 43 days (−0.7)
Reis Da Silva J.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.0Clay Elo 1381
Surface ELO
6.0+89 Clay Elo edge
4.1Overall Elo 1393
ELO gap
5.9Overall Elo 1486
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
7.8
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Casanova H.Reis Da Silva J.
Freshness·
70
—

Casanova H.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 62 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-3
Navone M.
Coria F.[1]
2-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Navone M.[7]
6-26-3
Darderi L.[3]
Collarini A.[1]
4-67-656-2
Navone M.
Darderi L.
2-66-47-5
Coria F.[1]
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Casanova H.
6-36-2
Darderi L.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Collarini A.[1]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Navone M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-37-62
Darderi L.
Cerundolo J.[2]
6-37-5
Navone M.
Agamenone F.
6-36-2
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Comesana F.[7]
7-654-67-63
Coria F.[1]
Choinski J.[8]
5-77-636-3
R16
Collarini A.[1]
Comesana F.
6-36-4
Navone M.[7]
Torres J.
7-50-67-5
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-726-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Aboian V.
6-36-4
Darderi L.[3]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-26-0
Villanueva G.
Hardt N.[6]
7-51-67-5
Burruchaga R.
Heide G.
6-16-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-13-66-1
Choinski J.[8]
Dellien H.
6-40-0
Cerundolo J.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-24-66-4
Navone M.
Elias G.
3-66-47-63
Agamenone F.
Villanueva G.
7-626-2
Comesana F.[7]
Kovalik J.
6-736-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Coria F.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-3
Darderi L.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-34-66-4
R32
Villanueva G.
Lama G.
7-667-62
Aboian V.
Pereira J.
3-66-13-0
Navone M.[7]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-36-2
Heide G.
Kestelboim M.
6-46-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Leite W.
6-36-2
Comesana F.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-2
Hardt N.[6]
Midon L.
6-46-4
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-26-1
Casanova H.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Barrena A.
6-06-4
Darderi L.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Collarini A.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-27-5
Burruchaga R.
Farjat T.
6-26-1
Huertas Del Pino C.
Otegui J.
6-46-2
Pellegrino A.
Andreozzi G.
7-56-2
Kopriva V.[5]
Svrcina D.
7-57-63
Cerundolo J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Villanueva G.
Torres J.
2-66-26-3
Agamenone F.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-43-67-5
Comesana F.[7]
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Kovalik J.
Neumayer L.
6-756-46-2
Olivo R.
Burruchaga R.
6-06-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Delbonis F.
6-36-4
Choinski J.[8]
Monteiro T.
6-31-66-3
Dellien H.
Olivieri G.
5-76-47-65
Coria F.[1]
Ficovich J.
7-642-66-3
Darderi L.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-26-4
Elias G.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
4-66-27-5
Navone M.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Bagnis F.
6-757-57-62