Salvatore Caruso vs Andrea Picchione — Rome CH Qualifying Round 2

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
ITA1
Salvatore Caruso
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
ITA
Andrea Picchione
#477ATP
1324ELO
1305Clay ELO
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
Caruso S.
6-3 7-5
Picchione A.
Caruso S.
672
Picchione A.
350

Salvatore Caruso defeated Andrea Picchione 6-3 7-5 in the Rome CH qualifying round 2 on clay. The result followed the form book — Salvatore Caruso came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Caruso S.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Picchione A.

Picchione A.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Caruso S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Caruso S.Picchione A.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
41%
41%
Break points saved·Even
53%
56%
Aces / match·Even
1.8
1.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (66 vs 74). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Caruso S.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Picchione A.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
4.1
Surface form
2.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.1
Minutes 14d
8.8
8.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Caruso S.[1]
Picchione A.
6-37-5
Vacherot V.[9]
Blanchet U.[5]
4-66-36-4
Nagal S.[12]
Durasovic V.[2]
7-55-76-2
Fonio G.[3]
Damas M.
6-06-0
Weis A.[7]
Nijboer R.
6-43-66-2
Forti F.[10]
Istomin D.
6-16-3
Q1
Istomin D.
Fanselow S.[6]
6-44-66-3
Durasovic V.[2]
Galoppini D.
6-736-27-5
Fonio G.[3]
Salomone F.
6-16-1
Weis A.[7]
Kirkin E.
6-25-77-5
Forti F.[10]
Barrientos N.
6-36-1
Nijboer R.
Travaglia S.[4]
7-642-67-5
Vacherot V.[9]
Karlovskiy E.
6-16-4
Blanchet U.[5]
Ocleppo J.
6-36-2
Damas M.
De Schepper K.[11]
4-66-36-4
Nagal S.[12]
Berrettini J.
6-46-1
Picchione A.
Bertola R.[8]
6-36-2