Roman Andres Burruchaga vs Gustavo Heide — Buenos Aires CH Round of 16

Buenos Aires CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Roman Andres Burruchaga
ARG
Roman Andres Burruchaga
#67ATP
1711ELO
1694Clay ELO
$446kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
BRA
Gustavo Heide
#136ATP
1695ELO
1679Clay ELO
$167kYTD
$609kCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWLWW
Burruchaga R.
6-1 6-2
Heide G.
Burruchaga R.
662
Heide G.
120

Roman Andres Burruchaga defeated Gustavo Heide 6-1 6-2 in the Buenos Aires CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Roman Andres Burruchaga came in ranked #67, leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's quarter-final. Roman Andres Burruchaga extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-02-10Buenos AiresQ1clayRoman Andres Burruchaga6-3 6-4
2024-07-01WimbledonQ1grassRoman Andres Burruchaga5-7 7-6(4) 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Burruchaga R.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Heide G.

Heide G.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Burruchaga R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Burruchaga R.Heide G.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
60%
64%
Return points won·Even
43%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.2
4.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Burruchaga R.Heide G.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
66
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
68
90
Break points won·Dominant
73
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
84
63
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
64
88

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Burruchaga R.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Heide G.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
6.4+15 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
3.6Clay Elo 1679
6.6Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
3.4Overall Elo 1695
5.0
H2H
5.0
2.8
Surface form
2.5
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
8.4
Minutes 14d
9.0
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Burruchaga R.Heide G.
Freshness·Clear edge
94
72

Burruchaga R.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 18 games (7d) · Heide G.: 4 days rest · 3 matches, 68 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Darderi L.[3]
6-36-3
Navone M.
Coria F.[1]
2-66-36-4
Semi-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Navone M.[7]
6-26-3
Darderi L.[3]
Collarini A.[1]
4-67-656-2
Navone M.
Darderi L.
2-66-47-5
Coria F.[1]
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
6-46-4
Quarter-finals
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Casanova H.
6-36-2
Darderi L.[3]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-36-2
Collarini A.[1]
Villanueva G.
6-26-1
Navone M.[7]
Burruchaga R.
6-37-62
Darderi L.
Cerundolo J.[2]
6-37-5
Navone M.
Agamenone F.
6-36-2
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Comesana F.[7]
7-654-67-63
Coria F.[1]
Choinski J.[8]
5-77-636-3
R16
Collarini A.[1]
Comesana F.
6-36-4
Navone M.[7]
Torres J.
7-50-67-5
Casanova H.
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-726-4
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Aboian V.
6-36-4
Darderi L.[3]
Huertas Del Pino C.
6-26-0
Villanueva G.
Hardt N.[6]
7-51-67-5
Burruchaga R.
Heide G.
6-16-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Dellien Velasco M.
6-13-66-1
Choinski J.[8]
Dellien H.
6-40-0
Cerundolo J.[2]
Pellegrino A.
6-24-66-4
Navone M.
Elias G.
3-66-47-63
Agamenone F.
Villanueva G.
7-626-2
Comesana F.[7]
Kovalik J.
6-736-36-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Olivo R.
6-36-4
Coria F.[1]
Reis Da Silva J.
6-16-3
Darderi L.
Kopriva V.[5]
6-34-66-4
R32
Villanueva G.
Lama G.
7-667-62
Aboian V.
Pereira J.
3-66-13-0
Navone M.[7]
Lingua Lavallen A.
6-36-2
Heide G.
Kestelboim M.
6-46-3
Dellien Velasco M.
Leite W.
6-36-2
Comesana F.
Pucinelli De Almeida M.
6-46-2
Hardt N.[6]
Midon L.
6-46-4
Torres J.
Zukas M.
6-26-1
Casanova H.
Boscardin Dias P.
6-16-3
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Barrena A.
6-06-4
Darderi L.[3]
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Collarini A.[1]
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Seyboth Wild T.[8]
Hassan B.
6-24-66-3
Reis Da Silva J.
Ficovich J.[4]
6-27-5
Burruchaga R.
Farjat T.
6-26-1
Huertas Del Pino C.
Otegui J.
6-46-2
Pellegrino A.
Andreozzi G.
7-56-2
Kopriva V.[5]
Svrcina D.
7-57-63
Cerundolo J.[2]
Collarini A.
6-36-3
Villanueva G.
Torres J.
2-66-26-3
Agamenone F.
Tabilo A.[6]
6-43-67-5
Comesana F.[7]
Trungelliti M.
6-46-3
Kovalik J.
Neumayer L.
6-756-46-2
Olivo R.
Burruchaga R.
6-06-4
Diaz Acosta F.[3]
Delbonis F.
6-36-4
Choinski J.[8]
Monteiro T.
6-31-66-3
Dellien H.
Olivieri G.
5-76-47-65
Coria F.[1]
Ficovich J.
7-642-66-3
Darderi L.
Meligeni Alves F.
4-66-26-4
Elias G.
Barrios Vera T.[4]
4-66-27-5
Navone M.
Dellien Velasco M.
6-26-2
Reis Da Silva J.
Bagnis F.
6-757-57-62