Zizou Bergs vs Bernard Tomic — Savannah CH Round of 32

Savannah CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zizou Bergs
BEL1
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1696Clay ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
Bernard Tomic
AUS
Bernard Tomic
#206ATP
1475ELO
1420Clay ELO
$117kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
33 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLL
Bergs Z.
6-3 6-3
Tomic B.
Bergs Z.
662
Tomic B.
330

Zizou Bergs defeated Bernard Tomic 6-3 6-3 in the Savannah CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bergs Z.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Tomic B.

Tomic B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Serve advantage — Bergs Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bergs Z.Tomic B.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
62%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.6
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bergs Z.Tomic B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
69
53
Break points saved·Even
95
92
Break points won·Clear edge
21
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
92
74
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
91
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bergs Z.
7.9
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Tomic B.
4.7
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.4+276 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.6Clay Elo 1420
8.6Overall Elo 1808
ELO gap
1.4Overall Elo 1475
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.7
Surface form
2.6
9.06-match win streak
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
3.3
Minutes 14d
8.5
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bergs Z.Tomic B.
Freshness·Even
82
84

Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Tomic B.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 45 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Boyer T.
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Kypson P.
6-34-66-4
Boyer T.
Hemery C.
2-66-46-3
Quarter-finals
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Dougaz A.[5]
6-33-66-3
Hemery C.
Bergs Z.[1]
6-42-66-2
Kypson P.
Kicker N.[4]
6-26-3
Boyer T.
Krueger M.[7]
6-46-1
R16
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Echargui M.
0-66-36-4
Dougaz A.[5]
Gomez F.
7-636-4
Kypson P.
Zhu E.
4-66-26-1
Bergs Z.[1]
Damm M.
3-67-636-3
Kicker N.[4]
Martineau M.
6-36-4
Krueger M.[7]
Rybakov A.
6-41-66-0
Boyer T.
Alves M.
6-16-4
Hemery C.
Fratangelo B.
7-616-3
R32
Dougaz A.[5]
Kodat T.
6-26-3
Martineau M.
Blanch U.
6-43-66-4
Kypson P.
Michelsen A.[8]
4-66-37-65
Hemery C.
Galarneau A.[6]
6-787-647-64
Fratangelo B.
Jacquet K.
6-26-0
Bergs Z.[1]
Tomic B.
6-36-3
Boyer T.
Couacaud E.[3]
6-26-3
Alves M.
Sinclair C.
6-27-61
Rybakov A.
Chappell N.
6-26-3
Zhu E.
Arnaboldi A.
6-44-66-1
Krueger M.[7]
Kuzuhara B.
7-57-613
Damm M.
Yevseyev D.
6-16-4
Kicker N.[4]
Kirchheimer S.
6-16-1
Diaz Acosta F.[2]
Crawford O.
6-16-2
Gomez F.
Ejupovic E.
5-76-26-4
Echargui M.
Statham J.
6-46-4
Krueger M.
Kuzuhara B.
7-57-613