Jesper De Jong vs Franco Agamenone — Rome CH Quarter-final

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jesper De Jong
NED
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 24 April 2023
clay
Franco Agamenone
ITA2
Franco Agamenone
#268ATP
1454ELO
1434Clay ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWWL
De Jong J.
6-3 6-4
Agamenone F.
De Jong J.
662
Agamenone F.
340

Jesper De Jong defeated Franco Agamenone 6-3 6-4 in the Rome CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73, defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
De Jong J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Agamenone F.

Agamenone F.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

De Jong J.Agamenone F.
49
Serve
—
32
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
De Jong J.Agamenone F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
58%
Return points won·Even
40%
41%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.7
2.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 169). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Jong J.Agamenone F.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
56
41
Break points saved·Dominant
90
59
Break points won·Clear edge
37
51
Deciding sets·Dominant
69
43
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
57
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
De Jong J.
7.7
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Agamenone F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.4+262 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.6Clay Elo 1434
7.2Overall Elo 1711
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1454
10.0No prior meetings
H2H
0.0
7.1
Surface form
6.5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.6
Minutes 14d
7.2
7.0
3-set count
6.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
7.0
Defending pts

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
De Jong J.Agamenone F.
Freshness·Even
90
89

De Jong J.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d) · Agamenone F.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 31 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Nagal S.
De Jong J.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
De Jong J.
Cobolli F.
7-56-3
Nagal S.
De Loore J.[8]
2-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Cobolli F.
Trungelliti M.
7-57-5
De Jong J.
Agamenone F.[2]
6-36-4
Nagal S.
Houkes M.
7-56-0
De Loore J.[8]
Ritschard A.
5-76-16-4
R16
Agamenone F.[2]
Roca Batalla O.
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.
Fonio G.
2-66-16-2
Cobolli F.
Forti F.
7-56-1
Houkes M.
Sels J.[5]
6-47-65
De Loore J.[8]
Piraino G.
6-766-16-4
Ritschard A.
Weis A.
7-56-2
De Jong J.
Mager G.
6-06-3
Nagal S.
Tabacco F.
6-36-0
R32
Agamenone F.[2]
Caruso S.
6-36-4
Fonio G.
Bellucci M.[3]
6-36-4
Ritschard A.
Serdarusic N.
7-637-5
Piraino G.
Fatic N.
5-0
Tabacco F.
Andreev A.
3-0
De Jong J.
Gengel M.
6-36-2
Weis A.
Marozsan F.[1]
6-46-4
Nagal S.
Maestrelli F.
6-26-4
Mager G.
Neuchrist M.[7]
7-646-4
Roca Batalla O.
Damas M.
6-16-1
Trungelliti M.
Arnaboldi F.
6-46-3
De Loore J.[8]
Geerts M.
6-26-2
Houkes M.
Vacherot V.
4-66-36-4
Sels J.[5]
Jianu F.
7-56-3
Forti F.
Durasovic V.
6-36-3
Cobolli F.
Moreno De Alboran N.
7-6104-67-61