Qinwen Zheng vs Alycia Parks — Stuttgart Round of 32

Stuttgart · WTA · Round of 32
Qinwen Zheng
CHN
Qinwen Zheng
#138WTA
1852ELO
1811Clay ELO
$283kYTD
$10MCAREER
23 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 April 2023
clay
Alycia Parks
USA
Alycia Parks
#81WTA
1648ELO
1566Clay ELO
25 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWLWL
Zheng Q.
6-4 6-4
Parks A.
Zheng Q.
662
Parks A.
440

Qinwen Zheng defeated Alycia Parks 6-4 6-4 in the Stuttgart round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Alycia Parks came in ranked #81. Qinwen Zheng extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Qinwen Zheng edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2026-02-08DohaR32hardQinwen Zheng7-6(4) 3-6 6-2
2022-06-13BerlinR32grassAlycia Parks6-3 7-6(4)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Zheng Q.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Parks A.

Parks A.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Zheng Q.

Serve advantage — Zheng Q.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Zheng Q.Parks A.
—
Serve
23
—
Return
0

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Zheng Q.Parks A.
1st serve in·Even
53%
55%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
43%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
44%
41%
Break points saved·Even
58%
55%
Aces / match·Even
6.5
6.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.0
7.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (164 vs 193). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zheng Q.Parks A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
61
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
79
Break points won·Dominant
100
66
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
64
Tiebreaks·Even
89
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zheng Q.
6.6
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Parks A.
5.3
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
8.3+245 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
1.7Clay Elo 1566
7.4Overall Elo 1852
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1648
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.5
Surface form
3.0
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 4
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zheng Q.Parks A.
Freshness·Even
98
96

Zheng Q.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Parks A.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Weather
11°CDrizzle
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 78%

Draw

Final
Swiatek I.[1]
Sabalenka A.[2]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Swiatek I.[1]
Jabeur O.[3]
3-0
Sabalenka A.[2]
Potapova A.
6-16-2
Quarter-finals
Sabalenka A.[2]
Badosa P.
4-66-46-4
Swiatek I.[1]
Pliskova K.
4-66-16-2
Jabeur O.[3]
Haddad Maia B.
6-36-0
Potapova A.
Garcia C.[4]
4-66-36-3
R16
Haddad Maia B.
Rybakina E.[6]
6-13-1
Sabalenka A.[2]
Krejcikova B.
6-26-3
Garcia C.[4]
Maria T.
7-656-4
Jabeur O.[3]
Ostapenko J.
1-67-56-3
Pliskova K.
Vekic D.
6-26-757-65
Badosa P.
Bucsa C.
6-16-2
Swiatek I.[1]
Zheng Q.
6-16-4
Potapova A.
Gauff C.[5]
6-26-3
R32
Haddad Maia B.
Trevisan M.
7-51-1
Bucsa C.
Korpatsch T.
3-66-46-0
Vekic D.
Alexandrova E.
7-677-65
Krejcikova B.
Samsonova L.
6-26-0
Potapova A.
Martic P.
6-33-67-64
Pliskova K.
Sakkari M.[8]
6-26-3
Zheng Q.
Parks A.
6-46-4
Ostapenko J.
Raducanu E.
6-26-1
Rybakina E.[6]
Niemeier J.
7-56-3
Maria T.
In Albon Y.
6-24-67-64
Badosa P.
Kasatkina D.[7]
6-16-1
Gauff C.[5]
Kudermetova V.
6-24-67-63