Thai Son Kwiatkowski vs Dominik Koepfer — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Thai Son Kwiatkowski
#1589ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 April 2023
clay
GER3
Dominik Koepfer
#1085ATP
32 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWLWW
Kwiatkowski T.
3-6 6-3 6-4
Koepfer D.
Kwiatkowski T.
3662
Koepfer D.
6341

Thai Son Kwiatkowski defeated Dominik Koepfer 3-6 6-3 6-4 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kwiatkowski T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Koepfer D.

Koepfer D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kwiatkowski T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kwiatkowski T.Koepfer D.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
4.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.9
3.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (83 vs 111). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kwiatkowski T.Koepfer D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
5
71
Break points saved·Dominant
65
94
Break points won·Clear edge
6
28
Deciding sets·Dominant
1
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
26
87

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kwiatkowski T.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 28 days (−0.3)
Koepfer D.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
5.8
Surface form
8.8
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
5.6
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
9.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[6]
Wu T.[5]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Wu T.[5]
Couacaud E.[7]
4-66-17-65
Bergs Z.[6]
Hong S.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[7]
Michelsen A.
7-57-5
Wu T.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-46-3
Hong S.
Echargui M.
6-42-66-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Zhang Z.[1]
6-37-5
R16
Echargui M.
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
7-617-5
Couacaud E.[7]
Popko D.
6-46-1
Hong S.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-16-4
Michelsen A.
Pouille L.
6-37-5
Bergs Z.[6]
Kypson P.
6-26-2
Zhang Z.[1]
Jacquet K.
6-36-1
Wu T.[5]
Krueger M.
6-22-66-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Kang K.
6-46-4
R32
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
Fratangelo B.
6-36-4
Krueger M.
Kirchheimer S.
6-766-26-3
Wu T.[5]
Rybakov A.
6-46-4
Echargui M.
Gomez F.
6-12-66-4
Jacquet K.
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-1
Jacquet K.
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Pouille L.
Martineau M.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Blanch U.
6-37-5
Zhang Z.[1]
Kicker N.
6-16-2
Noguchi R.[8]
Hemery C.
6-46-2
Popko D.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Hong S.
Harrison C.
6-36-1
Kang K.
Sinclair C.
3-67-666-4
Michelsen A.
Ugo Carabelli C.[2]
5-76-36-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Damm M.
5-77-636-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Koepfer D.[3]
3-66-36-4