Zhizhen Zhang vs Nicolas Kicker — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zhizhen Zhang
CHN1
Zhizhen Zhang
#156ATP
1682ELO
1633Clay ELO
$546kYTD
$4.6MCAREER
29 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 April 2023
clay
Nicolas Kicker
ARG
Nicolas Kicker
#322ATP
1385ELO
1373Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWWL
Zhang Z.
6-1 6-2
Kicker N.
Zhang Z.
662
Kicker N.
120

Zhizhen Zhang defeated Nicolas Kicker 6-1 6-2 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zhizhen Zhang came in ranked #156, defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Zhang Z.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Kicker N.

Kicker N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Zhang Z.

Serve advantage — Kicker N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zhang Z.Kicker N.
1st serve in·Even
63%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
42%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.1
1.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.2
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (153 vs 116). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zhang Z.Kicker N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
30
Break points saved·Dominant
94
56
Break points won·Dominant
14
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
91
30
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
43
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Zhang Z.
7.8
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Kicker N.
3.4
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Injury return: 36 days (−1.0)
Form & Matchup
9.4+260 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
0.6Clay Elo 1373
9.4Overall Elo 1682
ELO gap
0.6Overall Elo 1385
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.4
Surface form
4.4
0.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.2
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
8.5
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Zhang Z.Kicker N.
Freshness·Clear edge
86
100

Zhang Z.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 21 games (7d) · Kicker N.: 18 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[6]
Wu T.[5]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Wu T.[5]
Couacaud E.[7]
4-66-17-65
Bergs Z.[6]
Hong S.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[7]
Michelsen A.
7-57-5
Wu T.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-46-3
Hong S.
Echargui M.
6-42-66-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Zhang Z.[1]
6-37-5
R16
Echargui M.
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
7-617-5
Couacaud E.[7]
Popko D.
6-46-1
Hong S.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-16-4
Michelsen A.
Pouille L.
6-37-5
Bergs Z.[6]
Kypson P.
6-26-2
Zhang Z.[1]
Jacquet K.
6-36-1
Wu T.[5]
Krueger M.
6-22-66-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Kang K.
6-46-4
R32
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
Fratangelo B.
6-36-4
Krueger M.
Kirchheimer S.
6-766-26-3
Wu T.[5]
Rybakov A.
6-46-4
Echargui M.
Gomez F.
6-12-66-4
Jacquet K.
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-1
Jacquet K.
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Pouille L.
Martineau M.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Blanch U.
6-37-5
Zhang Z.[1]
Kicker N.
6-16-2
Noguchi R.[8]
Hemery C.
6-46-2
Popko D.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Hong S.
Harrison C.
6-36-1
Kang K.
Sinclair C.
3-67-666-4
Michelsen A.
Ugo Carabelli C.[2]
5-76-36-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Damm M.
5-77-636-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Koepfer D.[3]
3-66-36-4