Seong Chan Hong vs Christian Harrison — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
KOR
Seong Chan Hong
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 April 2023
clay
USA
Christian Harrison
32 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWWL
Hong S.
6-3 6-1
Harrison C.
Hong S.
662
Harrison C.
310

Seong Chan Hong defeated Christian Harrison 6-3 6-1 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Christian Harrison came in defending last year's quarter-final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hong S.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Harrison C.

Harrison C.serving68% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Hong S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hong S.Harrison C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
54%
Aces / match·Even
4.2
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 33). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hong S.Harrison C.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
52
34
Break points saved·Even
77
78
Break points won·Even
30
33
Deciding sets·Clear edge
65
49
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
12

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hong S.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Harrison C.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
6.4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
8.4
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
7.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[6]
Wu T.[5]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Wu T.[5]
Couacaud E.[7]
4-66-17-65
Bergs Z.[6]
Hong S.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[7]
Michelsen A.
7-57-5
Wu T.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-46-3
Hong S.
Echargui M.
6-42-66-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Zhang Z.[1]
6-37-5
R16
Echargui M.
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
7-617-5
Couacaud E.[7]
Popko D.
6-46-1
Hong S.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-16-4
Michelsen A.
Pouille L.
6-37-5
Bergs Z.[6]
Kypson P.
6-26-2
Zhang Z.[1]
Jacquet K.
6-36-1
Wu T.[5]
Krueger M.
6-22-66-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Kang K.
6-46-4
R32
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
Fratangelo B.
6-36-4
Krueger M.
Kirchheimer S.
6-766-26-3
Wu T.[5]
Rybakov A.
6-46-4
Echargui M.
Gomez F.
6-12-66-4
Jacquet K.
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-1
Jacquet K.
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Pouille L.
Martineau M.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Blanch U.
6-37-5
Zhang Z.[1]
Kicker N.
6-16-2
Noguchi R.[8]
Hemery C.
6-46-2
Popko D.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Hong S.
Harrison C.
6-36-1
Kang K.
Sinclair C.
3-67-666-4
Michelsen A.
Ugo Carabelli C.[2]
5-76-36-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Damm M.
5-77-636-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Koepfer D.[3]
3-66-36-4