Seong Chan Hong vs Moez Echargui — Tallahassee CH Quarter-final

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
KOR
Seong Chan Hong
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 April 2023
clay
Moez Echargui
TUN
Moez Echargui
#151ATP
1416ELO
1342Clay ELO
$171kYTD
$469kCAREER
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Hong S.
6-4 2-6 6-1
Echargui M.
Hong S.
6262
Echargui M.
4611

Seong Chan Hong defeated Moez Echargui 6-4 2-6 6-1 in the Tallahassee CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Seong Chan Hong came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 2–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Hong S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Echargui M.

Echargui M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Hong S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Hong S.Echargui M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.2
3.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (126 vs 160). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Hong S.Echargui M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
52
4
Break points saved·Dominant
77
48
Break points won·Clear edge
30
11
Deciding sets·Dominant
65
4
Tiebreaks·Dominant
80
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Hong S.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Echargui M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.0
Surface form
3.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
7.6
Minutes 14d
6.8
Prev. match
8.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Hong S.Echargui M.
Freshness·
—
100

Echargui M.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[6]
Wu T.[5]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Wu T.[5]
Couacaud E.[7]
4-66-17-65
Bergs Z.[6]
Hong S.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[7]
Michelsen A.
7-57-5
Wu T.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-46-3
Hong S.
Echargui M.
6-42-66-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Zhang Z.[1]
6-37-5
R16
Echargui M.
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
7-617-5
Couacaud E.[7]
Popko D.
6-46-1
Hong S.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-16-4
Michelsen A.
Pouille L.
6-37-5
Bergs Z.[6]
Kypson P.
6-26-2
Zhang Z.[1]
Jacquet K.
6-36-1
Wu T.[5]
Krueger M.
6-22-66-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Kang K.
6-46-4
R32
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
Fratangelo B.
6-36-4
Krueger M.
Kirchheimer S.
6-766-26-3
Wu T.[5]
Rybakov A.
6-46-4
Echargui M.
Gomez F.
6-12-66-4
Jacquet K.
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-1
Jacquet K.
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Pouille L.
Martineau M.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Blanch U.
6-37-5
Zhang Z.[1]
Kicker N.
6-16-2
Noguchi R.[8]
Hemery C.
6-46-2
Popko D.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Hong S.
Harrison C.
6-36-1
Kang K.
Sinclair C.
3-67-666-4
Michelsen A.
Ugo Carabelli C.[2]
5-76-36-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Damm M.
5-77-636-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Koepfer D.[3]
3-66-36-4