Moez Echargui vs Federico Agustin Gomez — Tallahassee CH Round of 32

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Moez Echargui
TUN
Moez Echargui
#151ATP
1416ELO
1342Clay ELO
$171kYTD
$469kCAREER
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 April 2023
clay
ARG
Federico Agustin Gomez
#209ATP
1445ELO
1410Clay ELO
$29kYTD
$680kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLLLLLW
Echargui M.
6-1 2-6 6-4
Gomez F.
Echargui M.
6262
Gomez F.
1641

Moez Echargui defeated Federico Agustin Gomez 6-1 2-6 6-4 in the Tallahassee CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Moez Echargui came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Echargui M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Gomez F.

Gomez F.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Echargui M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Echargui M.Gomez F.
1st serve in·Even
57%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
57%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.6
5.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (160 vs 186). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Echargui M.Gomez F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
4
36
Break points saved·Dominant
48
82
Break points won·Slight edge
11
18
Deciding sets·Dominant
4
62
Tiebreaks·Dominant
42
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Echargui M.
6.0
Even matchUmpiry Score
Gomez F.
3.8
Heavy underdogUmpiry Score
  • Extended break: 231 days (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
5.0Clay Elo 1342
Surface ELO
5.0+68 Clay Elo edge
5.5Overall Elo 1416
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1445
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.1
Surface form
3.7
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
6.8
Minutes 14d
8.0
Prev. match
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Echargui M.Gomez F.
Freshness·Dominant
100
59

Echargui M.: 19 days rest · Gomez F.: 2 days rest · 4 matches, 111 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[6]
Wu T.[5]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Wu T.[5]
Couacaud E.[7]
4-66-17-65
Bergs Z.[6]
Hong S.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[7]
Michelsen A.
7-57-5
Wu T.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-46-3
Hong S.
Echargui M.
6-42-66-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Zhang Z.[1]
6-37-5
R16
Echargui M.
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
7-617-5
Couacaud E.[7]
Popko D.
6-46-1
Hong S.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-16-4
Michelsen A.
Pouille L.
6-37-5
Bergs Z.[6]
Kypson P.
6-26-2
Zhang Z.[1]
Jacquet K.
6-36-1
Wu T.[5]
Krueger M.
6-22-66-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Kang K.
6-46-4
R32
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
Fratangelo B.
6-36-4
Krueger M.
Kirchheimer S.
6-766-26-3
Wu T.[5]
Rybakov A.
6-46-4
Echargui M.
Gomez F.
6-12-66-4
Jacquet K.
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-1
Jacquet K.
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Pouille L.
Martineau M.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Blanch U.
6-37-5
Zhang Z.[1]
Kicker N.
6-16-2
Noguchi R.[8]
Hemery C.
6-46-2
Popko D.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Hong S.
Harrison C.
6-36-1
Kang K.
Sinclair C.
3-67-666-4
Michelsen A.
Ugo Carabelli C.[2]
5-76-36-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Damm M.
5-77-636-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Koepfer D.[3]
3-66-36-4