Pedro Sousa vs Steven Diez — Oeiras 3 CH Quarter-final

Oeiras 3 CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
POR
Pedro Sousa
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 April 2023
clay
CAN
Steven Diez
#1565ATP
35 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWLWWW
Sousa P.
7-5 3-6 6-3
Diez S.
Sousa P.
7362
Diez S.
5631

Pedro Sousa defeated Steven Diez 7-5 3-6 6-3 in the Oeiras 3 CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Pedro Sousa came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Pedro Sousa extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Pedro Sousa closed it out in three sets, 7–5 3–6 6–3.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-07-03WimbledonQ2grassPedro Sousa7-5 2-6 6-2
2017-05-29Roland GarrosQ2clayPedro Sousa6-3 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Sousa P.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Diez S.

Diez S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Sousa P.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sousa P.Diez S.
1st serve in·Even
66%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
47%
Service points won·Even
58%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
52%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.2
1.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (13 vs 89). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sousa P.Diez S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
46
4
Break points saved·Slight edge
57
48
Break points won·Clear edge
48
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
3
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
31
8

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Sousa P.
6.5
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Diez S.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
4.8
Surface form
5.9
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
3.5
4.0
3-set count
4.0
7.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.[7]
Cerundolo J.[4]
6-36-4
Semi-finals
Cerundolo J.[4]
Sousa P.
6-26-4
Piros Z.[7]
Ofner S.[3]
6-46-2
Quarter-finals
Sousa P.
Diez S.
7-53-66-3
Cerundolo J.[4]
Uchida K.[6]
6-36-3
Ofner S.[3]
Vavassori A.[8]
5-76-36-4
Piros Z.[7]
Coppejans K.
6-06-2
R16
Piros Z.[7]
Merida Aguilar D.
6-46-3
Sousa P.
Muller A.[2]
7-57-64
Diez S.
Furness E.
7-626-1
Cerundolo J.[4]
Llamas Ruiz P.
6-46-3
Uchida K.[6]
Andreev A.
6-11-66-2
Vavassori A.[8]
Tseng C.
6-36-1
Ofner S.[3]
Mccabe J.
2-66-16-2
Coppejans K.
Mannarino A.[1]
4-66-26-3
R32
Llamas Ruiz P.
Guinard M.
6-13-0
Sousa P.
Rocha H.
6-36-4
Mccabe J.
Domingues J.
2-66-37-63
Piros Z.[7]
Sweeny D.
6-26-4
Merida Aguilar D.
Cretu C.
6-46-4
Coppejans K.
Faria J.
6-26-2
Mannarino A.[1]
Lazarov A.
5-77-56-2
Tseng C.
Squire H.
6-26-3
Furness E.
Harris B.
7-57-63
Muller A.[2]
Jianu F.
6-47-63
Vavassori A.[8]
Ferreira Silva F.
6-26-0
Diez S.
Sousa J.[5]
6-16-3
Cerundolo J.[4]
Vale D.
6-46-4
Andreev A.
Mayot H.
6-36-4
Uchida K.[6]
De Loore J.
6-47-63
Ofner S.[3]
Nouza P.
6-36-4