Zizou Bergs vs Patrick Kypson — Tallahassee CH Round of 16

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Zizou Bergs
BEL6
Zizou Bergs
#35ATP
1808ELO
1696Clay ELO
$995kYTD
$4.0MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 April 2023
clay
Patrick Kypson
USA
Patrick Kypson
#112ATP
1641ELO
1555Clay ELO
$260kYTD
$1.1MCAREER
26 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLWWL
Bergs Z.
6-2 6-2
Kypson P.
Bergs Z.
662
Kypson P.
220

Zizou Bergs defeated Patrick Kypson 6-2 6-2 in the Tallahassee CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zizou Bergs came in ranked #35, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Zizou Bergs extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-05-06Rome MastersQ1clayZizou Bergs4-6 6-3 6-4
2024-04-01HoustonR32clayZizou Bergs7-6(5) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Bergs Z.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Kypson P.

Kypson P.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Bergs Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bergs Z.Kypson P.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
65%
67%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
66%
Aces / match·Slight edge
6.6
7.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 194). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bergs Z.Kypson P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
69
42
Break points saved·Even
95
93
Break points won·Clear edge
21
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
92
17
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
91
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Bergs Z.
6.4
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Kypson P.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.2+142 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Clay Elo 1555
7.2Overall Elo 1808
ELO gap
2.8Overall Elo 1641
5.0
H2H
5.0
3.2
Surface form
7.6
Fatigue & Travel
4.7
Minutes 14d
4.9
3-set count
7.0
7.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Bergs Z.Kypson P.
Freshness·Clear edge
82
94

Bergs Z.: 10 days rest · 3 matches (14d) · Kypson P.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Bergs Z.[6]
Wu T.[5]
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Wu T.[5]
Couacaud E.[7]
4-66-17-65
Bergs Z.[6]
Hong S.
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Couacaud E.[7]
Michelsen A.
7-57-5
Wu T.[5]
Kwiatkowski T.
4-66-46-3
Hong S.
Echargui M.
6-42-66-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Zhang Z.[1]
6-37-5
R16
Echargui M.
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
7-617-5
Couacaud E.[7]
Popko D.
6-46-1
Hong S.
Noguchi R.[8]
6-16-4
Michelsen A.
Pouille L.
6-37-5
Bergs Z.[6]
Kypson P.
6-26-2
Zhang Z.[1]
Jacquet K.
6-36-1
Wu T.[5]
Krueger M.
6-22-66-4
Kwiatkowski T.
Kang K.
6-46-4
R32
Diaz Acosta F.[4]
Fratangelo B.
6-36-4
Krueger M.
Kirchheimer S.
6-766-26-3
Wu T.[5]
Rybakov A.
6-46-4
Echargui M.
Gomez F.
6-12-66-4
Jacquet K.
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-1
Jacquet K.
Kuzuhara B.
6-26-1
Bergs Z.[6]
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-3
Pouille L.
Martineau M.
6-36-2
Kypson P.
Blanch U.
6-37-5
Zhang Z.[1]
Kicker N.
6-16-2
Noguchi R.[8]
Hemery C.
6-46-2
Popko D.
Chappell N.
6-36-4
Hong S.
Harrison C.
6-36-1
Kang K.
Sinclair C.
3-67-666-4
Michelsen A.
Ugo Carabelli C.[2]
5-76-36-2
Couacaud E.[7]
Damm M.
5-77-636-2
Kwiatkowski T.
Koepfer D.[3]
3-66-36-4