Alexandre Aubriot vs Matija Pecotic — Tallahassee CH Qualifying Round 1

Tallahassee CH · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 1
FRA
Alexandre Aubriot
#881ATP
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 17 April 2023
clay
CRO11
Matija Pecotic
#1882ATP
37 yrs · 185 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLWL
Aubriot A.
7-6 6-3
Pecotic M.
Aubriot A.
7862
Pecotic M.
6630

Alexandre Aubriot defeated Matija Pecotic 7-6 6-3 in the Tallahassee CH qualifying round 1 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Aubriot A.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Pecotic M.

Pecotic M.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Aubriot A.

Serve advantage — Pecotic M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Aubriot A.Pecotic M.
1st serve in·Even
65%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
66%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
32%
42%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.1
3.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (8 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Aubriot A.
4.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 189 days (−1.5)
Pecotic M.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
Surface form
3.5
0.0Lost last 4
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.1
Prev. match
8.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Q2
Sinclair C.[3]
Potenza L.[9]
6-16-3
Jacquet K.[5]
Aubriot A.
6-46-3
Damm M.[6]
Williams C.
6-36-1
Gomez F.
Nanda G.[4]
6-16-4
Kypson P.[2]
Young D.
6-06-2
Kirchheimer S.[1]
Harrison R.[12]
6-24-4
Q1
Jacquet K.[5]
Alves M.
6-46-4
Damm M.[6]
Markes C.
6-46-3
Gomez F.
Pichler D.[8]
6-36-3
Kypson P.[2]
Bernard J.
6-37-5
Young D.
Mayo A.[7]
6-42-66-4
Harrison R.[12]
Bigun K.
6-27-61
Nanda G.[4]
Kim A.
6-46-2
Aubriot A.
Pecotic M.[11]
7-666-3
Kirchheimer S.[1]
Kiger M.
6-34-66-2
Williams C.
Bangoura S.[10]
7-56-4
Potenza L.[9]
Boyer T.
6-46-1
Sinclair C.[3]
Scaglia M.
6-747-56-2