Filip Misolic vs Gianluca Mager — Roseto Degli Abruzzi CH Round of 16

Roseto Degli Abruzzi CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Filip Misolic
AUT1
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 16 April 2023
clay
ITA
Gianluca Mager
#1223ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLW
Misolic F.
7-5 6-2
Mager G.
Misolic F.
762
Mager G.
520

Filip Misolic defeated Gianluca Mager 7-5 6-2 in the Roseto Degli Abruzzi CH round of 16 on clay. Filip Misolic claimed a first win over Gianluca Mager in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Filip Misolic closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–2.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-01-16Australian OpenQ1hardGianluca Mager6-2 3-6 7-6(6)

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mager G.

Mager G.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Mager G.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
61%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
5.1
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 105). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Mager G.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
40
Break points saved·Slight edge
91
86
Break points won·Dominant
53
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
66
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
6.3
Marginal edgeUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Mager G.
6.2
Even matchUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0
H2H
5.0
6.2
Surface form
5.5
0.0
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.1
Minutes 14d
8.8
7.0
3-set count
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Misolic F.[1]
Collignon R.
4-67-57-66
Semi-finals
Collignon R.
Ionel N.[7]
1-66-46-1
Misolic F.[1]
Svrcina D.[6]
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Svrcina D.[6]
De Jong J.
6-46-4
Ionel N.[7]
Agamenone F.[2]
6-46-2
Collignon R.
Onclin G.[8]
5-76-46-2
Misolic F.[1]
Pellegrino A.[5]
6-14-66-4
R16
De Jong J.
Sels J.[3]
6-06-0
Collignon R.
Nava E.[4]
6-36-2
Onclin G.[8]
Forti F.
6-41-66-3
Svrcina D.[6]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-47-5
Agamenone F.[2]
Feldbausch K.
6-06-1
Ionel N.[7]
Nagal S.
7-57-66
Pellegrino A.[5]
Caruso S.
7-646-3
Misolic F.[1]
Mager G.
7-56-2
R32
Ionel N.[7]
Lavagno E.
7-54-4
De Jong J.
Piraino G.
2-66-37-5
Caruso S.
Added D.
6-46-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Kirkin E.
6-46-0
Collignon R.
Marchenko I.
6-756-26-2
Sels J.[3]
Ferrari G.
7-632-66-3
Onclin G.[8]
Serdarusic N.
7-55-76-4
Feldbausch K.
Navone M.
7-656-0
Nagal S.
Berrettini J.
6-36-0
Forti F.
Fonio G.
7-646-2
Agamenone F.[2]
Moroni G.
6-37-5
Nava E.[4]
Droguet T.
6-42-66-0
Svrcina D.[6]
Zuk K.
7-56-0
Pellegrino A.[5]
Valkusz M.
7-56-2
Mager G.
Milojevic N.
6-16-2
Misolic F.[1]
Torres J.
6-16-1