Dalibor Svrcina vs Jesper De Jong — Roseto Degli Abruzzi CH Quarter-final

Roseto Degli Abruzzi CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Dalibor Svrcina
CZE6
Dalibor Svrcina
#114ATP
1640ELO
1578Clay ELO
$300kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
23 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 16 April 2023
clay
Jesper De Jong
NED
Jesper De Jong
#73ATP
1711ELO
1696Clay ELO
$612kYTD
$2.3MCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWWWL
Svrcina D.
6-4 6-4
De Jong J.
Svrcina D.
662
De Jong J.
440

Dalibor Svrcina defeated Jesper De Jong 6-4 6-4 in the Roseto Degli Abruzzi CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Jesper De Jong came in ranked #73.

Key context

  • Match story: Dalibor Svrcina edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Svrcina D.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs De Jong J.

De Jong J.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Svrcina D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Svrcina D.De Jong J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
72%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
45%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
45%
40%
Break points saved·Even
56%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.1
5.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Svrcina D.De Jong J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
34
57
Break points saved·Dominant
44
90
Break points won·Dominant
90
37
Deciding sets·Dominant
27
69
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
62

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Svrcina D.
5.5
Slight disadvantageUmpiry Score
De Jong J.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
4.6Clay Elo 1578
Surface ELO
5.4+117 Clay Elo edge
5.5Overall Elo 1640
ELO gap
4.5Overall Elo 1711
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
2.2
Surface form
7.6
0.0Lost last 5
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
9.3
Minutes 14d
6.5
3-set count
7.0
9.0
Prev. match
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Svrcina D.De Jong J.
Freshness·Slight edge
89
78

Svrcina D.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 41 games (7d) · De Jong J.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 25 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Misolic F.[1]
Collignon R.
4-67-57-66
Semi-finals
Collignon R.
Ionel N.[7]
1-66-46-1
Misolic F.[1]
Svrcina D.[6]
6-37-63
Quarter-finals
Svrcina D.[6]
De Jong J.
6-46-4
Ionel N.[7]
Agamenone F.[2]
6-46-2
Collignon R.
Onclin G.[8]
5-76-46-2
Misolic F.[1]
Pellegrino A.[5]
6-14-66-4
R16
De Jong J.
Sels J.[3]
6-06-0
Collignon R.
Nava E.[4]
6-36-2
Onclin G.[8]
Forti F.
6-41-66-3
Svrcina D.[6]
Rodriguez Taverna S.
6-47-5
Agamenone F.[2]
Feldbausch K.
6-06-1
Ionel N.[7]
Nagal S.
7-57-66
Pellegrino A.[5]
Caruso S.
7-646-3
Misolic F.[1]
Mager G.
7-56-2
R32
Ionel N.[7]
Lavagno E.
7-54-4
De Jong J.
Piraino G.
2-66-37-5
Caruso S.
Added D.
6-46-1
Rodriguez Taverna S.
Kirkin E.
6-46-0
Collignon R.
Marchenko I.
6-756-26-2
Sels J.[3]
Ferrari G.
7-632-66-3
Onclin G.[8]
Serdarusic N.
7-55-76-4
Feldbausch K.
Navone M.
7-656-0
Nagal S.
Berrettini J.
6-36-0
Forti F.
Fonio G.
7-646-2
Agamenone F.[2]
Moroni G.
6-37-5
Nava E.[4]
Droguet T.
6-42-66-0
Svrcina D.[6]
Zuk K.
7-56-0
Pellegrino A.[5]
Valkusz M.
7-56-2
Mager G.
Milojevic N.
6-16-2
Misolic F.[1]
Torres J.
6-16-1