Andrey Rublev vs Jan Lennard Struff — Monte Carlo Masters Quarter-final

Monte Carlo Masters · ATP · Quarter-final
Andrey Rublev
RUS5
Andrey Rublev
#13ATP
1902ELO
1872Clay ELO
$1.6MYTD
$34MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
Jan Lennard Struff
GER
Jan Lennard Struff
#74ATP
1694ELO
1659Clay ELO
$492kYTD
$13MCAREER
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
Rublev A.
6-1 7-6
Struff J.
Rublev A.
6772
Struff J.
1650

Andrey Rublev defeated Jan Lennard Struff 6-1 7-6 in the Monte Carlo Masters quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Andrey Rublev came in ranked #13, defending last year's round of 16. Andrey Rublev narrowed the head-to-head to 3–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrey Rublev came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–6.

Head to head

2–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-05-31Roland GarrosR128clayJan Lennard Struff6-3 7-6(6) 4-6 3-6 6-4
2021-05-10Rome MastersR32clayAndrey Rublev6-7(7) 6-1 6-4
2021-02-02Atp CupSFhardAndrey Rublev3-6 6-1 6-2
2018-09-17St. PetersburgR32carpetJan Lennard Struff6-4 7-6(6)
2016-05-23Roland GarrosQ2clayJan Lennard Struff6-1 7-6(1)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Rublev A.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Struff J.

Struff J.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Rublev A.

Serve advantage — Rublev A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Rublev A.Struff J.
14
Serve
—
62
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Rublev A.Struff J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
76%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Even
67%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
66%
63%
Aces / match·Slight edge
7.9
8.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 190). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rublev A.Struff J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
88
61
Break points saved·Even
100
99
Break points won·Dominant
72
21
Deciding sets·Dominant
97
68
Tiebreaks·Even
92
94

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Rublev A.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Struff J.
6.1
Even matchUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.2+213 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.8Clay Elo 1659
7.4Overall Elo 1902
ELO gap
2.6Overall Elo 1694
4.6
H2H
5.4
6.8
Surface form
5.1
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
Minutes 14d
8.7
3-set count
7.0
8.0
Prev. match
7.0
6.0
Surface transition
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Rublev A.Struff J.
Freshness·Dominant
94
59

Rublev A.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Struff J.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 87 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
16°COvercast
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 62%
Final
Rublev A.[5]
Rune H.[6]
5-76-27-5
Semi-finals
Rune H.[6]
Sinner J.[7]
1-67-57-5
Rublev A.[5]
Fritz T.[8]
5-76-16-3
Quarter-finals
Rublev A.[5]
Struff J.
6-17-65
Sinner J.[7]
Musetti L.[16]
6-26-2
Rune H.[6]
Medvedev D.[3]
6-36-4
Fritz T.[8]
Tsitsipas S.[2]
6-26-4
R16
Musetti L.[16]
Djokovic N.[1]
4-67-56-4
Sinner J.[7]
Hurkacz H.[10]
3-67-666-1
Rune H.[6]
Berrettini M.
W/O
Struff J.
Ruud C.[4]
6-17-66
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Jarry N.
6-36-4
Medvedev D.[3]
Zverev A.[13]
3-67-57-67
Fritz T.[8]
Lehecka J.
4-66-46-1
Rublev A.[5]
Khachanov K.[9]
7-646-2
R32
Djokovic N.[1]
Gakhov I.
7-656-2
Sinner J.[7]
Schwartzman D.
6-03-1
Hurkacz H.[10]
Draper J.
6-36-737-5
Medvedev D.[3]
Sonego L.
6-36-2
Rune H.[6]
Thiem D.
6-26-4
Rublev A.[5]
Munar J.
4-66-26-2
Khachanov K.[9]
Ivashka I.
7-626-2
Struff J.
De Minaur A.[14]
6-36-2
Ruud C.[4]
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-57-61
Fritz T.[8]
Wawrinka S.
7-6106-2
Lehecka J.
Dimitrov G.
7-646-4
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Bonzi B.
4-1
Zverev A.[13]
Bautista Agut R.
6-46-4
Berrettini M.
Cerundolo F.
5-77-616-4
Jarry N.
Popyrin A.
3-67-56-4
Musetti L.[16]
Nardi L.
6-06-0
R64
Gakhov I.
Mcdonald M.
7-662-66-3
Nardi L.
Vacherot V.
7-57-5
Musetti L.[16]
Kecmanovic M.
7-616-0
Hurkacz H.[10]
Djere L.
6-757-657-65
Draper J.
Baez S.
6-37-5
Bautista Agut R.
Krajinovic F.
5-77-6106-1
Zverev A.[13]
Bublik A.
3-66-26-4
Munar J.
Huesler M.
7-634-66-4
Khachanov K.[9]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-26-2
De Minaur A.[14]
Murray A.
6-16-3
Struff J.
Ramos A.
6-46-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Fucsovics M.
3-67-626-1
Dimitrov G.
Shelton B.
6-13-66-3
Jarry N.
Coric B.[15]
6-26-3
Popyrin A.
Lajovic D.
7-616-3
Bonzi B.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-17-5
Sonego L.
Humbert U.
3-67-57-5
Lehecka J.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-17-5
Schwartzman D.
Goffin D.
6-46-2
Ivashka I.
Evans D.
2-66-26-3
Cerundolo F.
Norrie C.[11]
6-36-4
Berrettini M.
Cressy M.
6-46-2
Thiem D.
Gasquet R.
6-16-4
Wawrinka S.
Griekspoor T.
5-76-36-4