Jan Lennard Struff vs Alex De Minaur — Monte Carlo Masters Round of 32

Monte Carlo Masters · ATP · Round of 32
Jan Lennard Struff
GER
Jan Lennard Struff
#74ATP
1694ELO
1659Clay ELO
$492kYTD
$13MCAREER
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
Alex De Minaur
AUS14
Alex De Minaur
#6ATP
1961ELO
1869Clay ELO
$2.4MYTD
$25MCAREER
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWLWW
Struff J.
6-3 6-2
De Minaur A.
Struff J.
662
De Minaur A.
320

Jan Lennard Struff defeated Alex De Minaur 6-3 6-2 in the Monte Carlo Masters round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Alex De Minaur came in ranked #6, leading the head-to-head 5–1, defending last year's round of 32. Jan Lennard Struff narrowed the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-10-21ViennaR32hardAlex De Minaur2-6 6-2 6-2
2024-05-27Roland GarrosR32clayAlex De Minaur4-6 6-4 6-3 6-3
2024-03-18Miami MastersR32hardAlex De Minaur7-6(3) 6-4
2020-08-24Cincinnati MastersR64hardJan Lennard Struff6-2 6-4
2019-10-21BaselQFhardAlex De Minaur6-4 7-6(4)
2018-03-05Indian Wells MastersR128hardAlex De Minaur3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5)
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Struff J.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs De Minaur A.

De Minaur A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Struff J.

Serve advantage — De Minaur A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Struff J.De Minaur A.
—
Serve
—
—
Return
39

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Struff J.De Minaur A.
1st serve in·Even
58%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
55%
Service points won·Even
65%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
41%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.8
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (190 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Struff J.De Minaur A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
61
95
Break points saved·Even
99
99
Break points won·Dominant
21
97
Deciding sets·Dominant
68
97
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
94
99

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Struff J.
5.9
Even matchUmpiry Score
De Minaur A.
7.1
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
2.5Clay Elo 1659
Surface ELO
7.5+210 Clay Elo edge
1.4Overall Elo 1694
ELO gap
8.6Overall Elo 1961
5.0
H2H
5.0
5.1
Surface form
5.3
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
8.7
Minutes 14d
7.0
3-set count
7.0
Prev. match
4.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Struff J.De Minaur A.
Freshness·Clear edge
53
73

Struff J.: 4 days rest · 2 matches, 87 games (7d) · De Minaur A.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 72 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
16°COvercast
Wind 14 km/hHumidity 62%
Final
Rublev A.[5]
Rune H.[6]
5-76-27-5
Semi-finals
Rune H.[6]
Sinner J.[7]
1-67-57-5
Rublev A.[5]
Fritz T.[8]
5-76-16-3
Quarter-finals
Rublev A.[5]
Struff J.
6-17-65
Sinner J.[7]
Musetti L.[16]
6-26-2
Rune H.[6]
Medvedev D.[3]
6-36-4
Fritz T.[8]
Tsitsipas S.[2]
6-26-4
R16
Musetti L.[16]
Djokovic N.[1]
4-67-56-4
Sinner J.[7]
Hurkacz H.[10]
3-67-666-1
Rune H.[6]
Berrettini M.
W/O
Struff J.
Ruud C.[4]
6-17-66
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Jarry N.
6-36-4
Medvedev D.[3]
Zverev A.[13]
3-67-57-67
Fritz T.[8]
Lehecka J.
4-66-46-1
Rublev A.[5]
Khachanov K.[9]
7-646-2
R32
Djokovic N.[1]
Gakhov I.
7-656-2
Sinner J.[7]
Schwartzman D.
6-03-1
Hurkacz H.[10]
Draper J.
6-36-737-5
Medvedev D.[3]
Sonego L.
6-36-2
Rune H.[6]
Thiem D.
6-26-4
Rublev A.[5]
Munar J.
4-66-26-2
Khachanov K.[9]
Ivashka I.
7-626-2
Struff J.
De Minaur A.[14]
6-36-2
Ruud C.[4]
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-57-61
Fritz T.[8]
Wawrinka S.
7-6106-2
Lehecka J.
Dimitrov G.
7-646-4
Tsitsipas S.[2]
Bonzi B.
4-1
Zverev A.[13]
Bautista Agut R.
6-46-4
Berrettini M.
Cerundolo F.
5-77-616-4
Jarry N.
Popyrin A.
3-67-56-4
Musetti L.[16]
Nardi L.
6-06-0
R64
Gakhov I.
Mcdonald M.
7-662-66-3
Nardi L.
Vacherot V.
7-57-5
Musetti L.[16]
Kecmanovic M.
7-616-0
Hurkacz H.[10]
Djere L.
6-757-657-65
Draper J.
Baez S.
6-37-5
Bautista Agut R.
Krajinovic F.
5-77-6106-1
Zverev A.[13]
Bublik A.
3-66-26-4
Munar J.
Huesler M.
7-634-66-4
Khachanov K.[9]
Davidovich Fokina A.
6-26-2
De Minaur A.[14]
Murray A.
6-16-3
Struff J.
Ramos A.
6-46-3
Van De Zandschulp B.
Fucsovics M.
3-67-626-1
Dimitrov G.
Shelton B.
6-13-66-3
Jarry N.
Coric B.[15]
6-26-3
Popyrin A.
Lajovic D.
7-616-3
Bonzi B.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-17-5
Sonego L.
Humbert U.
3-67-57-5
Lehecka J.
Ruusuvuori E.
6-17-5
Schwartzman D.
Goffin D.
6-46-2
Ivashka I.
Evans D.
2-66-26-3
Cerundolo F.
Norrie C.[11]
6-36-4
Berrettini M.
Cressy M.
6-46-2
Thiem D.
Gasquet R.
6-16-4
Wawrinka S.
Griekspoor T.
5-76-36-4