Jason Kubler vs Tung Lin Wu — Sarasota CH Round of 32

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS1
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1616Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1421Clay ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Kubler J.
6-4 6-3
Wu T.
Kubler J.
662
Wu T.
430

Jason Kubler defeated Tung Lin Wu 6-4 6-3 in the Sarasota CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Tung Lin Wu came in ranked #329, defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Kubler closed it out in two sets, 6–4 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kubler J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Wu T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kubler J.Wu T.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.6
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (86 vs 187). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kubler J.Wu T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
59
10
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
84
Break points won·Dominant
46
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
4

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kubler J.
7.4
Dominant favouriteUmpiry Score
Wu T.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+195 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Clay Elo 1421
8.1Overall Elo 1685
ELO gap
1.9Overall Elo 1406
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
5.2
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
6.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Kubler J.Wu T.
Freshness·
—
80

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[5]
Galan D.[3]
7-616-1
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-26-2
Galan D.[3]
Machac T.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Diallo G.
5-2
Couacaud E.
Olivieri G.
6-21-67-66
Galan D.[3]
Vukic A.
6-27-63
Machac T.
Kubler J.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Galan D.[3]
Boyer T.
6-43-0
Olivieri G.
Fratangelo B.
3-66-37-60
Altmaier D.[5]
Bergs Z.
7-56-4
Vukic A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-666-0
Machac T.
Kodat T.
6-41-66-1
Couacaud E.
Zhang Z.[2]
6-36-3
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Kubler J.[1]
Hong S.
6-36-4
R32
Couacaud E.
Kudla D.
5-1
Fratangelo B.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-47-5
Bergs Z.
Potenza L.
6-37-5
Altmaier D.[5]
Damm M.
6-756-37-5
Boyer T.
Sock J.
3-66-47-63
Vukic A.
Popko D.
6-16-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Alves M.
6-47-66
Zhang Z.[2]
Rybakov A.
6-47-61
Machac T.
Brouwer G.[8]
6-36-2
Hong S.
Svajda Z.
6-06-0
Kubler J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-3
Galan D.[3]
Shang J.
6-36-2
Kodat T.
Noguchi R.
6-31-67-5
Krueger M.
Gomez E.[4]
7-56-3
Olivieri G.
Harrison C.
6-44-67-5
Diallo G.
Diaz Acosta F.
3-66-27-65