Tomas Machac vs Toby Alex Kodat — Sarasota CH Round of 16

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1783Clay ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
USA
Toby Alex Kodat
23 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLWWW
Machac T.
6-4 1-6 6-1
Kodat T.
Machac T.
6162
Kodat T.
4611

Tomas Machac defeated Toby Alex Kodat 6-4 1-6 6-1 in the Sarasota CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 1–6 6–1.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kodat T.

Kodat T.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Machac T.Kodat T.
12
Serve
—
48
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Kodat T.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 86). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Kodat T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
40
Break points saved·Dominant
98
40
Break points won·Dominant
80
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
94
89
Tiebreaks·
97
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Machac T.
7.0
Strong advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Kodat T.
5.0
Heavy underdogUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
  • Extended break: 42 days (−0.7)
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
8.3
Surface form
7.03-match win streak
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
5.9
Minutes 14d
9.0
Prev. match
Surface transition
6.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[5]
Galan D.[3]
7-616-1
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-26-2
Galan D.[3]
Machac T.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Diallo G.
5-2
Couacaud E.
Olivieri G.
6-21-67-66
Galan D.[3]
Vukic A.
6-27-63
Machac T.
Kubler J.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Galan D.[3]
Boyer T.
6-43-0
Olivieri G.
Fratangelo B.
3-66-37-60
Altmaier D.[5]
Bergs Z.
7-56-4
Vukic A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-666-0
Machac T.
Kodat T.
6-41-66-1
Couacaud E.
Zhang Z.[2]
6-36-3
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Kubler J.[1]
Hong S.
6-36-4
R32
Couacaud E.
Kudla D.
5-1
Fratangelo B.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-47-5
Bergs Z.
Potenza L.
6-37-5
Altmaier D.[5]
Damm M.
6-756-37-5
Boyer T.
Sock J.
3-66-47-63
Vukic A.
Popko D.
6-16-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Alves M.
6-47-66
Zhang Z.[2]
Rybakov A.
6-47-61
Machac T.
Brouwer G.[8]
6-36-2
Hong S.
Svajda Z.
6-06-0
Kubler J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-3
Galan D.[3]
Shang J.
6-36-2
Kodat T.
Noguchi R.
6-31-67-5
Krueger M.
Gomez E.[4]
7-56-3
Olivieri G.
Harrison C.
6-44-67-5
Diallo G.
Diaz Acosta F.
3-66-27-65