Filip Misolic vs Nicholas David Ionel — Split CH Round of 32

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Filip Misolic
AUT6
Filip Misolic
#293ATP
1587ELO
1664Clay ELO
$111kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
24 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
Nicholas David Ionel
ROU
Nicholas David Ionel
#807ATP
23 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLLWLL
Misolic F.
6-3 6-3
Ionel N.
Misolic F.
662
Ionel N.
330

Filip Misolic defeated Nicholas David Ionel 6-3 6-3 in the Split CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Misolic F.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ionel N.

Ionel N.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Misolic F.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Misolic F.Ionel N.
1st serve in·Clear edge
59%
71%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
58%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.3
1.3
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (186 vs 71). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Misolic F.Ionel N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
79
3
Break points saved·Dominant
91
36
Break points won·Clear edge
53
41
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
6
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
6

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Misolic F.
5.8
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Ionel N.
6.9
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
0.0No prior meetings
H2H
10.0
5.8
Surface form
6.2
0.0Lost last 2
Win streak
Fatigue & Travel
8.9
Minutes 14d
3.1
3-set count
4.0
8.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
5.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.
Gombos N.[3]
7-627-69
Semi-finals
Piros Z.
Oconnell C.[1]
6-26-4
Gombos N.[3]
Polmans M.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.
Misolic F.[6]
6-36-3
Gombos N.[3]
Valkusz M.
7-6106-3
Piros Z.
Albot R.
7-655-76-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Prizmic D.
6-27-5
R16
Polmans M.
Ajdukovic D.
7-657-65
Gombos N.[3]
Zuk K.
6-33-67-66
Piros Z.
Mochizuki S.
6-47-61
Prizmic D.
Cazaux A.
7-56-2
Misolic F.[6]
Ymer E.
4-67-667-61
Valkusz M.
Maestrelli F.
6-21-66-2
Albot R.
Guinard M.
7-56-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Fatic N.
6-16-3
R32
Piros Z.
Marozsan F.[4]
6-36-3
Gombos N.[3]
Cobolli F.
6-13-66-1
Valkusz M.
Klein L.[5]
3-66-37-65
Maestrelli F.
Medjedovic H.
7-636-1
Misolic F.[6]
Ionel N.
6-36-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Sweeny D.
7-656-2
Ajdukovic D.
Ivanovski K.
6-736-16-1
Ymer E.
Coppejans K.
3-66-36-3
Zuk K.
Navone M.
6-47-68
Albot R.
Uchida K.[8]
6-17-5
Guinard M.
Debru G.
4-66-26-4
Cazaux A.
Bellucci M.[7]
6-37-5
Prizmic D.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
4-66-36-4
Fatic N.
Furness E.
6-37-5
Mochizuki S.
Mayot H.
6-21-66-2
Polmans M.
Rodionov J.[2]
6-44-66-3