Jason Kubler vs Seong Chan Hong — Sarasota CH Round of 16

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS1
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1616Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
KOR
Seong Chan Hong
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLWL
Kubler J.
6-3 6-4
Hong S.
Kubler J.
662
Hong S.
340

Jason Kubler defeated Seong Chan Hong 6-3 6-4 in the Sarasota CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jason Kubler came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Kubler closed it out in two sets, 6–3 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kubler J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Hong S.

Hong S.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kubler J.Hong S.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.6
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (86 vs 126). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kubler J.Hong S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
52
Break points saved·Clear edge
90
77
Break points won·Clear edge
46
30
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
65
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Kubler J.
6.7
Slight advantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Hong S.
5.7
Slight disadvantageUmpiry ScorePartial · surface data limited
Form & Matchup
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
7.1
Surface form
2.0
Win streak
0.0Lost last 3
Fatigue & Travel
7.3
Minutes 14d
8.1
9.0
Prev. match
8.0
Context
6.0
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[5]
Galan D.[3]
7-616-1
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-26-2
Galan D.[3]
Machac T.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Diallo G.
5-2
Couacaud E.
Olivieri G.
6-21-67-66
Galan D.[3]
Vukic A.
6-27-63
Machac T.
Kubler J.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Galan D.[3]
Boyer T.
6-43-0
Olivieri G.
Fratangelo B.
3-66-37-60
Altmaier D.[5]
Bergs Z.
7-56-4
Vukic A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-666-0
Machac T.
Kodat T.
6-41-66-1
Couacaud E.
Zhang Z.[2]
6-36-3
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Kubler J.[1]
Hong S.
6-36-4
R32
Couacaud E.
Kudla D.
5-1
Fratangelo B.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-47-5
Bergs Z.
Potenza L.
6-37-5
Altmaier D.[5]
Damm M.
6-756-37-5
Boyer T.
Sock J.
3-66-47-63
Vukic A.
Popko D.
6-16-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Alves M.
6-47-66
Zhang Z.[2]
Rybakov A.
6-47-61
Machac T.
Brouwer G.[8]
6-36-2
Hong S.
Svajda Z.
6-06-0
Kubler J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-3
Galan D.[3]
Shang J.
6-36-2
Kodat T.
Noguchi R.
6-31-67-5
Krueger M.
Gomez E.[4]
7-56-3
Olivieri G.
Harrison C.
6-44-67-5
Diallo G.
Diaz Acosta F.
3-66-27-65