Zsombor Piros vs Norbert Gombos — Split CH Final

Split CH · CHALLENGER · Final
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
Norbert Gombos
SVK3
Norbert Gombos
#370ATP
1472ELO
1455Clay ELO
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
Piros Z.
7-6 7-6
Gombos N.
Piros Z.
777112
Gombos N.
62690

Zsombor Piros defeated Norbert Gombos 7-6 7-6 in the Split CH final on clay. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120, defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gombos N.

Gombos N.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Gombos N.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
4.9
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 166). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Gombos N.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
57
41
Break points saved·Even
84
83
Break points won·Clear edge
32
8
Deciding sets·Clear edge
85
70
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Piros Z.
7.3
Strong advantageUmpiry Score
Gombos N.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Form & Matchup
7.3+165 Clay Elo edge
Surface ELO
2.7Clay Elo 1455
7.8Overall Elo 1661
ELO gap
2.2Overall Elo 1472
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
6.1
Surface form
5.7
Win streak
0.0
Fatigue & Travel
3.7
Minutes 14d
9.2
0.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Surface transition
6.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Gombos N.
Freshness·Dominant
54
79

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d) · Gombos N.: 3 days rest · 2 matches, 39 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Piros Z.
Gombos N.[3]
7-627-69
Semi-finals
Piros Z.
Oconnell C.[1]
6-26-4
Gombos N.[3]
Polmans M.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Polmans M.
Misolic F.[6]
6-36-3
Gombos N.[3]
Valkusz M.
7-6106-3
Piros Z.
Albot R.
7-655-76-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Prizmic D.
6-27-5
R16
Polmans M.
Ajdukovic D.
7-657-65
Gombos N.[3]
Zuk K.
6-33-67-66
Piros Z.
Mochizuki S.
6-47-61
Prizmic D.
Cazaux A.
7-56-2
Misolic F.[6]
Ymer E.
4-67-667-61
Valkusz M.
Maestrelli F.
6-21-66-2
Albot R.
Guinard M.
7-56-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Fatic N.
6-16-3
R32
Piros Z.
Marozsan F.[4]
6-36-3
Gombos N.[3]
Cobolli F.
6-13-66-1
Valkusz M.
Klein L.[5]
3-66-37-65
Maestrelli F.
Medjedovic H.
7-636-1
Misolic F.[6]
Ionel N.
6-36-3
Oconnell C.[1]
Sweeny D.
7-656-2
Ajdukovic D.
Ivanovski K.
6-736-16-1
Ymer E.
Coppejans K.
3-66-36-3
Zuk K.
Navone M.
6-47-68
Albot R.
Uchida K.[8]
6-17-5
Guinard M.
Debru G.
4-66-26-4
Cazaux A.
Bellucci M.[7]
6-37-5
Prizmic D.
Rodriguez Taverna S.
4-66-36-4
Fatic N.
Furness E.
6-37-5
Mochizuki S.
Mayot H.
6-21-66-2
Polmans M.
Rodionov J.[2]
6-44-66-3