Daniel Elahi Galan vs Juncheng Shang — Sarasota CH Round of 32

Sarasota CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Daniel Elahi Galan
COL3
Daniel Elahi Galan
#304ATP
1531ELO
1492Clay ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 10 April 2023
clay
CHN
Juncheng Shang
#274ATP
1746ELO
1640Clay ELO
21 yrs · 180 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWWLWW
Galan D.
6-3 6-2
Shang J.
Galan D.
662
Shang J.
320

Daniel Elahi Galan defeated Juncheng Shang 6-3 6-2 in the Sarasota CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Galan D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Shang J.

Shang J.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Galan D.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Galan D.Shang J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
64%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.3
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 143). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Galan D.Shang J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
76
Break points saved·Even
92
96
Break points won·Clear edge
21
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
55
94
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
66
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Umpiry Score

Pre-match
Galan D.
5.4
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
Shang J.
5.2
Clear underdogUmpiry Score
  • Recent retirement (−1.5)
Form & Matchup
3.1Clay Elo 1492
Surface ELO
6.9+148 Clay Elo edge
2.2Overall Elo 1531
ELO gap
7.8Overall Elo 1746
5.0No prior meetings
H2H
5.0
3.9
Surface form
4.9
Win streak
0.0Lost last 2
Fatigue & Travel
6.5
Minutes 14d
9.2
7.0
3-set count
9.0
Prev. match
9.0
Context
Defending pts
5.0

The Umpiry Score combines match-context factors — matchup, form, fatigue, travel and motivation — into a single 0–10 score, updated daily. Read how it works.

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Altmaier D.[5]
Galan D.[3]
7-616-1
Semi-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Couacaud E.
6-26-2
Galan D.[3]
Machac T.
6-46-1
Quarter-finals
Altmaier D.[5]
Diallo G.
5-2
Couacaud E.
Olivieri G.
6-21-67-66
Galan D.[3]
Vukic A.
6-27-63
Machac T.
Kubler J.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Galan D.[3]
Boyer T.
6-43-0
Olivieri G.
Fratangelo B.
3-66-37-60
Altmaier D.[5]
Bergs Z.
7-56-4
Vukic A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
7-666-0
Machac T.
Kodat T.
6-41-66-1
Couacaud E.
Zhang Z.[2]
6-36-3
Diallo G.
Krueger M.
6-26-4
Kubler J.[1]
Hong S.
6-36-4
R32
Couacaud E.
Kudla D.
5-1
Fratangelo B.
Cerundolo J.[7]
6-47-5
Bergs Z.
Potenza L.
6-37-5
Altmaier D.[5]
Damm M.
6-756-37-5
Boyer T.
Sock J.
3-66-47-63
Vukic A.
Popko D.
6-16-1
Ugo Carabelli C.
Alves M.
6-47-66
Zhang Z.[2]
Rybakov A.
6-47-61
Machac T.
Brouwer G.[8]
6-36-2
Hong S.
Svajda Z.
6-06-0
Kubler J.[1]
Wu T.
6-46-3
Galan D.[3]
Shang J.
6-36-2
Kodat T.
Noguchi R.
6-31-67-5
Krueger M.
Gomez E.[4]
7-56-3
Olivieri G.
Harrison C.
6-44-67-5
Diallo G.
Diaz Acosta F.
3-66-27-65